They are both pretty good at efficiency. The edge goes to the OC Lupo. Both are smooth.How would you describe the differences between the 95 SB and OC? I have the 95 SB and like it, but if the OC is better….
They are both pretty good at efficiency. The edge goes to the OC Lupo. Both are smooth.How would you describe the differences between the 95 SB and OC? I have the 95 SB and like it, but if the OC is better….
When mommy and daddy fight, I get more for Christmas. Since Maggard and Italian Barber are both having flash sales, I felt the need to order a few things. I threw in the Lupo 95 OC plate to get free shipping on the whole order.They are both pretty good at efficiency. The edge goes to the OC Lupo. Both are smooth.
I'll add my 2 cents. I have the Lupo 72, GC 68, Karve Overlander and Christopher Bradley (using the mildest B plate. Don't like the C and D). I do love a mild razor, and my newly acquired Lupo 72 is on its way to becoming my favourite. A little more blade feel that the GC, but gets the job done better for me, I even did a side by side with the GC today. The Karve Overlander is probably the easiest and smoothest in autolpilot mode, but the Lupo seems to be more enjoyable to use.Question for the mild razor lovers: how would you compare the Lupo 52 to the GC 68? And / or perhaps the Mamba 70? Has anyone got experience with either of these razors and can compare them? Comfort and efficiency? And bladefeel?
Turned the handle down last night on my friends lathe. Much better!Very nice and an impressive razor lineup you've gathered. Glad to hear it's working for you.
Just an FYI, if you know a machinist, you can have them cut that Ti handle at the first or second groove below the narrow point if you favor a shorter length.
I grabbed this photo from our friend @Raven Koenes shave journal.
View attachment 1788403
I realize I never responded to you.How would you describe the differences between the 95 SB and OC? I have the 95 SB and like it, but if the OC is better….