- Thread starter
- #61
Made in USA for outside markets.
So should they be removed from the Wiki of English made razors?
Last edited:
Made in USA for outside markets.
So should they be removed from the Wiki of English made razors?
However, I think the primary (or perhaps the only) oddity that has them linked with the British plant is the way that they're double-stamped with the diamond logo, which was never done in the States, as far as we know.
BTW, did you get sorted out on how to edit that wiki page? I can help you out if you're still stuck there.
I'm thinking download the page into a editor, make changes, upload page. I have an old copy of Dreamweaver, I just need to locate the discs and install it on my new computer. However, this is the busiest time of year for our business so the only time I get at the moment is between customers and late at night when when SWMBO has retired.
It's not HTML that you'd be editing there. The markup in edit mode is basically the same as you'd been using here in your posts. Clicking the "Edit" tab up at the top of the page will put you into editing mode where you can edit the entire page, or you can click the smaller "Edit" link on the far right in the same line as the section header to just edit that section.
The biggest thing I would say is that you should be sure that you always preview your changes before saving them. It'll save you a lot of heartache having to roll back and re-apply changes.
Thank you. I looked for an "Edit" tab both before and after your post. No trace. Near the top of the page is "article, discussion, watch" and further down on the right is "[hide]-[top]". So I opened the Wiki page in Internet Explorer instead of Google Chrome and I'm now seeing "article, discussion, edit, history, watch" and "[hide]-[top]-[edit]". I'm still not seeing the smaller "Edit" link on the far right in the same line as the section header to just edit that section.
I would leave them there just for now, but what we should probably do for now is add a "Remarks" column to the table. I'm suspicious of those razors as well, since, to the best of our knowledge, the ABC razors were only made in the US. However, I think the primary (or perhaps the only) oddity that has them linked with the British plant is the way that they're double-stamped with the diamond logo, which was never done in the States, as far as we know.
Wait, put that drink down, i think you may have a viable theory there.............Maybe the nullification of the patents is an indicator. The patent was granted to GilletteI can't imaging that tooling up to stamp these parts in this radically different way would have been a trivial matter, and I certainly can't see any reason why the Boston plant would have any reason to have stamped razors bound (seemingly exclusively) for the French market any differently than they were stamping their own standard razors -- aside from the possibly legally required "G-inside-D" mark.
I wonder if we're possibly seeing some kind of fallout in the shadow of the French revocation of Gillette's patent rights, if, in fact, Russel is correct on that point. One thing I notice on the later ABC cases is that the entry for France reads "Bts. S. G. du C" where on the older ones it gives the "July 3, 03" date.
I haven't had any luck in tracking down what that "S. G. du C" would have meant -- what you'd expect would be "S. G. D. G." for "sans garantie du gouvernement." My understanding is that this marking indicated that a patent was registered with the French government, but that the government disclaimed any liability for its safe or proper working as French patents were issued "without screening, at the risk of applicants, and without warranty as to the existence, novelty or merit of the invention, or the truth or accuracy of the description."
I have seen some sources who seemed to believe that the S.G.D.G mark meant that it wasn't protected, but as far as I can tell that is incorrect. I almost wonder if Russel made that mistake, but then that would also lead us back to wondering why we'd have these several examples of razors all presumably from the French market, marked as though they were made in the British plant, stamped with the American patent date.
I think I need a drink...
Wait, will everybody stop drinking!! What is this a rerun of Cheers?I've started keeping track of the razors with the US patent on the inner cylinder and am thinking it would be good to add them to the Wiki in a separate category. I would include the one in Italy that was sold early in the hope that it was a B&B member who bought it and may be able to provide the missing details.
However, if the two US made ABC razors are then moved over to this new category we are left with only G 5031, about which I also hold suspicions in that it doesn't have the leading zeros which are characteristic of the razors in the other series.
I think I need a drink too.....a wee drop of the Irish perhaps.
Now that's a truly strange beast. If it weren't for the U.S. patent date on the inner barrel (below) I would never have even remotely guessed that an American connection was possible there. Even as it is I would be more inclined to believe it was made somewhere else and just marked with the U.S. patent for some reason. I've never seen anything even remotely like that in a clearly American-made Single Ring set, but that exact style of marking (patent date aside) is what we'd consider "normal" from the Leicester plant.
View attachment 434003
View attachment 434004
It's also worth pointing out that the "G-inside-D" mark on this one is more of a "G" in a straight square.
BTW, did you get sorted out on how to edit that wiki page? I can help you out if you're still stuck there.
It shows on this page http://www.925-1000.com/Ffrench_marks.html
French Silverplate Marks - Maker's Trademark in a rectangle or square cartouche.
Wait, will everybody stop drinking!! What is this a rerun of Cheers?
Now that you have more than 45 posts you can go in the Wiki and edit your suggestions.