What's new

Dressing the Man

Discuss. Agree, disagree?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/tucker/tucker38.html

Guys, here is your one-article guide to dressing, based on many years in the rag business and a lifetime of observing the sheer ubiquity of error.

There are two general types of men's clothing.

First, there are clothes for public consumption: clothing in which to present yourself to others and thereby convey an elevated message about yourself. These are types of clothes you wear to work, to the store, out on the town, at a wedding, at church, at parties, or wherever people are going to see you. The primary objective here is that you look presentable, that you are civilized, a gentleman and not a beast.

The other type of clothing is that which serves a pure functional purpose: that is, that which you wear for yard work, fixing your car, an evening at home, a Saturday washing the house or cleaning, or just knocking around the park with kids. Everyone knows what type of clothes these are. They can all be bought at Wal-Mart or thrift stores, and they are made of cotton.

The great dressing error of our time is to confuse the two. Or more precisely: people think that it is perfectly okay to present yourself to others in clothes which serve a purely functional purpose. They say this is fine because it is comfortable – as if the only thing that matters in life is comfort. Well, it is also comfortable not to shave and not to bathe, and we have a word for people like that: slobs. If you don't want to be a slob, you have to live with a bit of discomfort.

If men could absorb that simple lesson, the world would be a much more beautiful place in which to live. Elevated dressing causes people to behave better. Crime might fall. Manners would begin to come back. People might clean up their language. They might listen to better music and read better books. Something resembling civilization might return.

Now the next step: how do you look presentable? For a man, it is a snap. Your full wardrobe need not take up more than 12 to 18 inches of closet space. You need:

* one or two suits in blue or grey
* a blue or black jacket or sports coat
* a jacket for summer (khaki or blue cotton or, if you want to be really fancy, seersucker)
* a tweed jacket for winter
* year-round grey wool trousers (light or dark or both)
* a few pairs of khakis
* 3 white and 3 blue shirts
* a selection of ties

That's all. That will get you through a lifetime, replacing them with something similar when these wear out. Mix as necessary. If you have chosen well, just about any jacket will go with your trousers. Just about any shirt will go with any jacket. Ties should be chosen with an eye to color, making sure that the tie stands out and does blend in with either jacket or shirt or trousers. Men's clothes should not "match"; they should go together, which is something else entirely.

But, you say, I'll look the same all the time! Right. This conveys an impression that you are a wise and stable person, not prone to flights of fancy and fits of fashion. There is a practical aspect here. You don't really want to wear clothes that cause people to comment: hey, that is a really nice forest-green, window-pane, double-breasted, peak-lapel, side-vent hunting jacket with leather patches! The next time you wear it, the comment will be: oh, you wore that last week! No, you don't really want people to zero in on your clothes as if they have an existence apart from you and your character. Clothes should not make the man; they should be the man.

As for adjustments, there are many things you can do to vary your wardrobe. The main trick here is obvious: you can switch ties around (only two knots are permissible: the four-in-hand or the half Windsor.) You can wear suspenders. You can have button-down shirts or plain collars. You can stick a linen handkerchief in your pocket. You can add a hat. All these things can make a world of difference, and make you look just different enough to make it appear that you have a huge wardrobe but not so different day to day that you come across as a loon.

Is this an expensive undertaking? Not in any way. Unless you have some size issue at work, most of this can be purchased at a thrift store. The other day I bought a pair of grey wool trousers and olive wool trousers at $3 a piece. The same items were available at a local men's shop for $90 and up. Down with retail! Sports coats are the same: unless you have some size issue to deal with, most are available at thrift stores. Shirts? Same. A buck a piece. Another option is the wonderful shirts from Lands End. Why spend $65 for a Gitman when you can spend $25 at Lands End?

Note that wearing a sports coat is not dressing up. A sports coat and trousers are casual wear. It is mostly what you should be wearing to light parties, most jobs, to the store. It is perfectly presentable for public consumption. But do not be deceived into thinking that you are "dressing up" when you wear them. A sports coat and trousers are the official uniform of a man who is just going about the business of life. When someone says, come casual!, this is what you wear.

Jackets can have two, three, or four buttons. They can have side vents, center vents, or no vents at all. Avoid double breasted until you have everything else. Americans do not wear hard-shoulders! Nor do Americans wear those crazy drop-lapel sexy-style models that Bill Clinton wore. Do not buy these under any circumstances. They are ridiculous. Finally, always prefer natural fibers over synthetics.

Suits are trickier. You can get them at thrift stores, but they are harder to come by. You can also see Ebay, which has an amazing selection of suits that you can buy for $20 and up. If this doesn't work, you have to go retail, and here you have to spend $450 and up for a decent suit. The worst thing to do is go to a department store and buy a $200 suit from the likes of JC Penny. These look horrible and they will fall apart. If you can't go thrift or Ebay, prepare to spend. It is worth it. A special note for older men: wear suits most or all of the time, and always ties. Ultimately, it is the only thing an older man looks good in.

If you are wearing a suit, you are dressed up but you are not formal. For formal wear, you need a dinner jacket and black tie. That is another subject entirely. These days, most people don't need formal clothing. If you do need it once or twice in a year, it is worth it to buy the whole package. Don't spend a lot of money! In formal occasions, guys all look the same anyway, and you don't wear it enough to wear it out. You can get away with spending $150 in some discount formal shop. But I digress.

On shoes, there are only two brands that qualify as quality shoes: Allen Edmonds and Alden. All others are junk. Good shoes are expensive. Prepare to pay. The best possible shoe is the shell cordovan from Alden, starting at $440 and up. So it is. They last a lifetime. If you don't have the money, go to the military supply store and pay $10 for some used military oxfords. They look great! Ultimately, you need: a black shoe, a burgundy shoe, and a casual shoe (this, again, leaves aside shoes that go with functional wear). That's all. As for loafers, they are aptly named. The normative men's shoe should have laces.

This takes us to the issue of fit. Most people buy their shoes too small. Get a half size bigger than you think. Shoes should not hurt your feet. Don't believe your shoe will stretch. It should be right when you wear it out of the store.

Fitting a shirt is not hard. Measure your neck with a tape measure. A shirt should not be too loose around the neck (you should not be able to stick your whole hand in your collar!) nor should it be too tight (when you turn your head, your shirt should not turn with it). The sleeve length should be such that the cuff hits that bone at the top of your hand some 4 inches above your thumb.

Do I really need to say it? No short-sleeve "dress shirts" in public, ever! Also, do I really need to say this? Shirts are not supposed to be worn against the skin. Wear a T-shirt, please.

Jackets: most men wear them too tight! Resist the temptation to get them taken in. They should be loose and comfortable. Jacket sleeve length: men tend to wear them too long! One-quarter to one-half inch of your shirt cuff should show below the jacket. You should measure this standing in place.

It doesn't matter what your life activities are: fit is fit! I once had a drummer tell me that he needs his jacket sleeves long in order for them to look right as he plays his cymbals. Well, if so, I should make mine long to change a lightbulb! This is nonsense. There is only one way a jacket fits: properly.

Trousers: they are not supposed to fit like jeans! They are supposed to be loose and even bellowy by blue-jean standards. Do not have the seat taken in. Do not have the back leg taken in. Just wear them as they come. The length of leg should hit the top of your shoe. It should not break too much. Cuffs should be 1.5 inches, no less. Older men can get away with larger cuffs but not younger men.

Socks: nothing fancy, please! They should be blue, black, grey, or tan. Anything else, like argyles or other patterns, is too fussy for a gentleman. They conjure up an image of a guy rifling through a sock drawer try to find just the right sock for the occasion. This is an awful image. Socks should appear to be put on without any effort or thought. But: never wear a sock that is a lighter color than your jacket. No time to explain why. Just trust me on this point.

Finally, never underestimate the power of the iron. The iron is the ultimate tool for dressing well. It puts the crease in your trousers and takes the wrinkles out of your jackets. It flattens the placket on your shirt and puts a point in the cuffs of your pants. Your iron should come out frequently, almost daily in fact. If you are not ironing, you are not dressing well.

Yes, there is much more to say, but this article contains just about all you will ever need to know to look better than most every man in the world. Follow my advice and do your part to save civilization.

July 16, 2003

Jeffrey Tucker [send him mail] is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.

Copyright © 2003 LewRockwell.com
 
I tend to agree with his initial assertion that we should dress better, especially in public. (I was shocked to see people showing up to a friend's wake in tracksuits!) On the other hand, I don't agree with his choices. I would not feel comfortable in his very conservative choices. The idea that there are only two acceptable necktie knots is absurd, as we've seen from a thread on this BB--it depends on the shirt collar. And yes, I've gotten some wonderful clothing from thrift shops (most recently a green Italian cashmere blazer for $20), but if I could afford it, I'd get a bespoke suit made. "Americans don't do this" and "Americans don't do that," nonsense. I happen to like Italian tailoring. I just can't afford it. Only two brands of quality shoes? Hmmm.

I find his choices boring. Which might be fine for him, but not for everyone.

While I disagree with much of what he says, I appreciate that he has a strong point of view and expresses it without being wishy-washy about it.
 
I agree with the general thrust and underlying premise of this article. I do, however, find his recommendations overly conservative and downright boring in certain respects. My fundamental rule (and this applies to more than just clothing) is that you can never go wrong by buying quality; however, please don't confuse quality with price; a good example of this are Land's End shirts: excellent prices, excellent quality. But, inorder to buy quality you have to educate yourself on what it is you want to buy and where you intend to buy it. Also, I think individuality should play a role in one's clothing; one needs to develop one's own style without being flambouyant or trendy. For example, I have a penchant for pink shirts and argyle socks in my casual wardrobe, whilst for business attire I like shirts with French cuffs and tab or bar collars.
 
How about a nice overcoat/topcoat like these covert coats fi:

proxy.php


proxy.php


These are absolute must haves for the gentleman imo: classic, very stylish and versatile. I bought them recently and i'll wear them on every occasion, for work and in the weekends as well. The one in charcoal is more dressier, while the one in tan is very suitable to combine with autumn look. You can wear them with a suit or jacket or just with a shirt or sweater, with dress pants or with jeans, whatever you like.

They are icons in a classic gentleman's wardrobe. Can't go wrong with them...
 

ouch

Stjynnkii membörd dummpsjterd
Maybe he can expain the Lindsey Nelson effect that hits men later in life.
 
If he gets to tell me how to dress, I get to tell him how to shave. He is in dire need of one. :blink:

Maybe because this is how he shaves. I wouldn't want to either.


I used to do that believe it or not. Sensor Excel in the shower with nothing but water. I have to say, the results are actually fairly impressive, at least they were for me. Granted I could never get as close as I wanted, but I was left with zero irritation, which is something I still have a problem with to the day.
 
Overall, very good advice for someone with no idea of how to build their wardrobe or how to dress. However, once you knoww hat lookks good on you, you can expand the choices you make.

I own 14-16 suits, 7 sportcoats, 8 pairs of slacks, numerous socks, ties,belts , and pairs of shoes.

I normally wear 3 suits per week and 1 slack/sportcoat combo, so variety for me means everything.


Marty
 
I can't take fashion advice from a man who would suggest a gentleman wear suspenders. Braces, yes, but suspenders, no. And I think he is a little too opinionated on certain things, such as the break of the pant, which is a very personal decision to me, and the dress shoes. I'm sure he's trying to make a point, but I have some very nice dress shoes, that will last just as long, as Allen Edmonds or Alden, at a quarter of the price. Don't get me wrong, they're fantastic shoes and I'm dreaming of the day when I can afford a pair, but a man should not be led to believe he must have a pair of these shoes to look proper. Oh, and while I don't agree with his overly conservative vew on socks (and everything else, for that matter), I do agree that they should always be darker than your jacket (no jacket, then darker than your slacks), with very few exceptions.

I'll get off of my soapbox now.....
 
This from a guy who sports a bowtie (sans tux) and a face like a sheared sheep???

Personally I like the way I dress casually, but it would give many a fashion guru nightmares & fits.

I have 1 suit and bought that recently as I've lost 100+ lbs so the 3 I had were a "tad" loose on me.

One thing I do admittedly need help with in colours. My wife shakes her head at me sometimes if I'm colour-blind!!!
 
This from a guy who sports a bowtie (sans tux) and a face like a sheared sheep???

Personally I like the way I dress casually, but it would give many a fashion guru nightmares & fits.

I have 1 suit and bought that recently as I've lost 100+ lbs so the 3 I had were a "tad" loose on me.

One thing I do admittedly need help with in colours. My wife shakes her head at me sometimes if I'm colour-blind!!![/QUOTE]

I was flipping through the channels last weekend and came across that show "What Not to Wear", the woman who was getting the wardrobe makeover made a comment about the shoes the "fashion experts" chose for a certain outfit didn't really match. The so-called expert replied that they don't match, they go with the outfit. I have no idea what that means. :blink:

I do know that the male expert was wearing a teal sweater and looked ridiculous.
 
I was flipping through the channels last weekend and came across that show "What Not to Wear", the woman who was getting the wardrobe makeover made a comment about the shoes the "fashion experts" chose for a certain outfit didn't really match. The so-called expert replied that they don't match, they go with the outfit. I have no idea what that means. :blink:

I do know that the male expert was wearing a teal sweater and looked ridiculous.
Matt, my wife watches that show quite often. I've paid SOME attention to it at times, but there's never one for guys.

When it comes to colours, I live by the creed that black is the universal colour and matches ANYTHING. My personal live-in fashion expert screws up her face every time I wear a black belt with dark brown slacks and beige polo shirt.

Comments?
 
Matt, my wife watches that show quite often. I've paid SOME attention to it at times, but there's never one for guys.

When it comes to colours, I live by the creed that black is the universal colour and matches ANYTHING. My personal live-in fashion expert screws up her face every time I wear a black belt with dark brown slacks and beige polo shirt.

Comments?


90% of my wardrobe is black for just that reason. Colors complicate.

I had no idea the crime I was committing by wearing brown pants with a brown shirt. Apparently brown doesn't match with brown.

:a7:
 
90% of my wardrobe is black for just that reason. Colors complicate.

I had no idea the crime I was committing by wearing brown pants with a brown shirt. Apparently brown doesn't match with brown.

:a7:

It's the belt that twists her knickers. Every time we go shopping she wants me to buy a brown belt.

As a joke one time I went to the Goodwill, bought a white belt, plaid slacks and a striped (horizontal) shirt. OMG you should have seen her face when I came out "ready for work".
 
Back on topic, what's the difference between "braces" & "suspenders"?? And what's the issue with either???
 
Back in the 80s I found a book on the sale table of a local bookstore called Color for Men. It runs on the concept of assigning each person to a color category ("seasons") based on our natural coloration, and then describing the best palette for that season. When I figured out I was a Winter, it showed that the colors best for me were the ones I was most comfortable with anyway. Sounds a little hokey, but it's better than no guidance at all, and there are extra chapters on tie knots, collar types, and that sort of thing.
 
Back on topic, what's the difference between "braces" & "suspenders"?? And what's the issue with either???

Braces are dressy, usually made of silk (similar to a tie), and button into your slacks. Suspenders are not considered dress clothes, and clip onto your pants. Wearing suspenders with a suit is kind of like wearing tennis shoes with a suit.
 
Top Bottom