I was about to comment on that. Finally someone to call bullshait on it.Well, except for the part where he's repeating as confirmed fact the controversial idea that the Captain of the Titanic steamed at full speed through a known icefield.
After having received an earlier report, he changed course and headed on a more southern direction.
Later, the Titanic made a navigational error, and the Bridge thought they were about 52 nautical miles (59 statute miles) further southwest than they actually were.
At 7:30 pm Titanic calculated and reported their position as 41° 44’ N. and 50° 14’ W. and the last ice report they had received at 7:30pm was that the ice field was 42° 3′ N, 49° 9′ W. (nearly 60 statute miles to the NorthEast and behind them).
The later report at 9:40pm was not received by the Titanic.
Certainly some extra caution could have been exercised, but the idea that the Captain ordered them to steam at full speed through a known icefield is misleading.
Everything that went on that night was in line with common practices at the time. If it was 100% right or not is another discussion.
But unfortunately that’s the way safety evolves trough time.
I don’t understand how someone like him, who researched the entire thing, could continue with misleading facts and that discovery channel talk.