17 Oct 20222: The Leon blade, with today’s razor, soap, brush, razor, soap, brush, and with a long soak-in prep, yielded another DFS+ quality shave. Moderate buffing required to finish today’s shave.
Strangely, as I've forgotten and been reminded of, the Dura Sharps are the lone Teflon-coated blade in this carbon-steel bunch. Presumably, they should be smoother than the others from the first or second use, but its smoothness and sharpness have varied widely in previous razors. The irritation has been somewhat consistent, but the blade settled down on the third shave in both the Slim and the Old Type, and went four shaves in both, so I'm optimistic.Yes, I'll give the Dura Sharp a third shave. I think it's probably got enough sharpness to it, and maybe some smoothness will emerge as it dulls.
I have found blade exposure is more correlated with evenness of the shave than any blade characteristics. I have also found that closeness is more correlated with blade sharpness than any razor characteristics. Generally speaking, obviously there is some overlap.How can the same razor that doesn't get close enough to pick up stubble in some spots also cut closer than most razors in other spots?
Interesting. Do you find the relation to be that more exposure leads to more evenness or less evenness?I have found blade exposure is more correlated with evenness of the shave than any blade characteristics. I have also found that closeness is more correlated with blade sharpness than any razor characteristics. Generally speaking, obviously there is some overlap.
I should have been clearer, definitely more evenness. If you think about two extremes, a slight negative exposure and something like an r41, on the negative one you can only get the blade edge a certain distance from the base of the hair, even with pushing.Interesting. Do you find the relation to be that more exposure leads to more evenness or less evenness?
This makes sense. I ended up with all Gillettes, and I'm guessing they all have negative exposures, or else near zero. The smoother, but duller, blades will let me attack an area over and over without getting irritation. I end up with an approximation of a good shave, but it's tiresome and I wouldn't opt to do it outside of these trials (or the blade challenge PIFs). I've never shaved with the modern "aggressive" razors, and I imagine I would have to unlearn some habits that work with a mild razor/not-sharp blade combo, but I am curious.I should have been clearer, definitely more evenness. If you think about two extremes, a slight negative exposure and something like an r41, on the negative one you can only get the blade edge a certain distance from the base of the hair, even with pushing.
With a sufficient positive exposure, different for everybody, you have the flexibility to get as close as you need to while also being able pivot away slightly on other areas. What I have discovered is that on the flat lying hairs, there is a certain amount of slip happening before the blade catches and slices. The positive exposure can still grab these while the hair slips off on the negative razor.
As to pushing not completely fixing the problem with negative, more pushing causes more skin displacement by the safety bar and generally keeps the blade the same distance or more than with light pressure. I prefer very tight stretching and light buffing if I can't get a razor to pick up a spot of hairs, that way I am not roughing up my skin. It works on some razors, others are too negative and feel like they got it while shaving, but the hair pops back up after. The Hensons are the classic case of this and what have caused me the most trouble due to their fixed angle. The aggressive version solved this problem while the mild and medium are closer to each other, the medium being the one that I used to always over shave with because I couldn't get the angle to pick up jaw patches. I agree when some people say that certain people should use adjustables and change the setting for different parts of the face, if they are consistently having trouble with specific spots. If you simply use a sharper blade, it's likely just going to rough up the more sensitive areas. It's a balancing act really, one I probably think too much about. Eventually a person finds a nice combination of blade and razor and doesn't need a technical evaluation to tell them why it works!
I went back to see how the Super Power had done in the other razors, and it's all over the map. Interestingly, it was pretty mild in the Slim, set at 8, and didn't cut me. It's interesting how the Red Tip, with a similar geometry but a smaller blade gap, seems to be more aggressive. You could use both meanings of the word, as it cut me but also seemed to shave closely with less of a struggle than it did in the Slim.Treet Super Power
Shave One
Oct. 23, 2022
View attachment 1544482
Razor: Gillette Super Speed Red Tip
Aftershave: Mixture of dregs
Not a great first outing for the Super Power. Some fleeting cuts in the mustache but then also weepers that continued to weep.
There wasn’t anything particularly good about this shave to offset the particularly bad. Got close but not any closer than any other Treet. Had some lasting irritation.
Now I’m wondering if it’s even earned a second shave. I’m also not liking how the Treets I’ve tested have done in the Red Tip so far. It’s like starting to shave all over again. Maybe that’s good and I’ll learn how to do it again, but it’s puzzling to have arrived here again.