That is a work of art.
so...how about the shaving?
No questions about the looks, thats just awesome, but i am wondering wether there are actually usable damacus razors of decent steel quality and if so, what they perform like.
This might be the best looking razor I've ever seen. I love the black on black look. It's an oxymoron sort of blend of modern and vintage looks. It's the old style of shaving combined with modern materials.
Beautiful!
I'm curious about that blade. How do you get that black wood grain looking pattern on it? Is that how it was made, or is it a treatment to the metal?
What I'm asking is, can I do that to a vintage blade? If I could make a blade black like that, then I could make some similar scales and get that neat black on black look.
I know the question wasn't directed to me, but I have the answer for you.
It's called Damascus, the steel used to make that blade. It's made by folding two different metals together over and over. The grains you see (the ones that mimic wood grain) are the lines of the meeting of the two metals. You can't do that to an old blade since it is actually the metal the blade is made from. You can buy one, though, as I'm sure Alex would gladly inform you.
Cool! Thanks for the info.
Are these sorts of techniques discussed in the straight resto forums, or is there someplace I can read about the process?
I'm only just starting to shave with a straight razor, but the DIYer in me knows there will be some blade/scale restoration in my future.
OK, I'll stop hijacking the thread now
Well, not exactly. This blade was posted as a "pattern welded Damascus", which isn't true Damascus steel. The grain effect was more likely than not made using an acid bath. That's why the edge doesn't have the effect, as a mask was used on the edge.
I thought pattern welded Damascus was still Damascus. What's the difference?
I did some more reading and it seems that true Damascus gets its distinctive look from the unique composition of Damascus as well as the hammering and folding. Patterned-welded Damascus instead is the result of using two different kinds of steel (doesn't really matter which), which is then welded together and folded; these blades are then usually enhanced visually by an acid bath. The two look very similar to one another, but only one can truly be called Damascus.
So, it seems that "Damascus" is overloaded to refer to both the effect and a specific alloy. Pattern-welded Damascus is often referred to as just Damascus, although I feel like it's most sincere to note the difference since they really are quite different. For one, I imagine that a blade made out of true Damascus would cost significantly more than pattern-welded Damascus.
I've been doing a little reading, too, and it seems that the process for making true Damascus doesn't exist anymore. What, exactly, Damascus is still eludes me. I can't decide if the word "Damascus" refers to a specific alloy or a process of combining two different metals to form one (which would be an alloy, I suppose). Either way, "pattern welded" would seem to be the correct term for the Jaques blade above, and the 'grain' that appears really is the presence of two different metals. The acid in the bath just reacts differently with each metal, leaving each one a different color. As for the solid color edge, it could be that the pattern welded steel was folded around a separate, high carbon steel. I don't know if that is the case with this knife, but that seems to be a fairly common practice.
In conclusion, were we just arguing the label we give the steel that blade is made from? I concede that it is not Damascus, but am I right that the pattern results from the two different steels, right?