Impressive work! Thank you for your effort!
Impressive work! Thank you for your effort!
GDC, have you received your Kent yet?
No. It arrived in the U.S. Postal System yesterday.
Maybe I will have it by Tuesday afternoon.
Fantastic. I expect mine to ship tomorrow.
I'm looking forward to your initial thoughts.
Kent Infinity Silvertex - Thoughts
The quality of the brush is very good. The resin handle has clean lines and is well made. The stickers on this particular brush are very clear and legible. Now to the knot. The knot uses Generation 3.5 fibers which are similar, if not the same as, the ones used in the original Muhle STF Synthetic Silvertip brush. This today is referenced by the user community as the version 1 STF. Although not quite as good as the fibers used in Muhle STF (Version 2) or the original H.I.S. 28 mm synthetic brush, it is a very good fiber.
The Kent knot is made far denser than the original Muhle knots. This has the effect of concentrating the tips into a smaller area for greater backbone, but the tips are soft like the original Muhle Version 1 knot. Using a bowl and some current Williams soap, I was able to easily generate a test lather that was thick and could provide 3 face passes and a head pass with one soap application that covered the tip surface area of the knot. A better soap or cream would have done a far better job of creating lather but if it does well with current Williams then it is a good brush by any standards.
I hope this provides a little context on the new Kent.
Hi GDCarrington,
Thank you so much for the helpful and informative post! Much appreciated!![]()
Kent Infinity Silvertex - Thoughts
The quality of the brush is very good. The resin handle has clean lines and is well made. The stickers on this particular brush are very clear and legible. Now to the knot. The knot uses Generation 3.5 fibers which are similar, if not the same as, the ones used in the original Muhle STF Synthetic Silvertip brush. This today is referenced by the user community as the version 1 STF. Although not quite as good as the fibers used in Muhle STF (Version 2) or the original H.I.S. 28 mm synthetic brush, it is a very good fiber.
The Kent knot is made far denser than the original Muhle knots. This has the effect of concentrating the tips into a smaller area for greater backbone, but the tips are soft like the original Muhle Version 1 knot. Using a bowl and some current Williams soap, I was able to easily generate a test lather that was thick and could provide 3 face passes and a head pass with one soap application that covered the tip surface area of the knot. A better soap or cream would have done a far better job of creating lather but if it does well with current Williams then it is a good brush by any standards.
I hope this provides a little context on the new Kent.