Thanks for the history and the photos, gents.
Rob, I'm not questioning your info, but do you have documentation for any of that? In particular, the military / civilian differences in formulation. I realize that military procurement can be a surreal experience, what with $100 hammers and such, but that still seems a bit odd.
That was almost clever. However, deliberately misquoting someone is a form of slander. Besides, anyone with half a brain knows you can edit when quoting so they would clearly scroll up and see the actual post and then that only serves to further discredit your integrity and that of your fellow servants to the Tsar.
Sure, whatever you want to believe, pirate man.
And just for your information it's Czar, not Tsar. Tsardom of Cheddar lacks a certain alliteration. And before you say anything, Tsardom of Theddar would just sound bad.![]()
This is one of my all time favorite misnomers. It is amazing how something so false can get so ingrained into our psyche that we use it no matter how preposterous without a second thought. I can tell you that the reality is we have no choice but to buy from the lowest bidder, always! If anything we take it too far to this extreme. There are times we are forced to buy cheap when what we really need is reliable. There are processes in place to prevent such a thing. Just my .02
It may sound funny but it would be more accurate. Historically speaking it is Tsar. Czar is an English bastardization of the both the word and the title.
Rob, thank you for the post. It is interesting that it used to be a mouthwash. Hmm...
So what you're telling us is that the government doesn't waste money?
Anyway, nice history lesson Clubman.![]()
This is one of my all time favorite misnomers. It is amazing how something so false can get so ingrained into our psyche that we use it no matter how preposterous without a second thought. I can tell you that the reality is we have no choice but to buy from the lowest bidder, always! If anything we take it too far to this extreme. There are times we are forced to buy cheap when what we really need is reliable.
Like pirates care about bastardizing words, titles and such...![]()
Rob, I'm not questioning your info, but do you have documentation for any of that? In particular, the military / civilian differences in formulation. I realize that military procurement can be a surreal experience, but that still seems a bit odd.
This is one of my all time favorite misnomers.
It may sound funny but it would be more accurate. Historically speaking it is Tsar. Czar is an English bastardization of the both the word and the title.
Rob, thank you for the post. It is interesting that it used to be a mouthwash. Hmm...
If you try using it as such, let us know how it works out for you, Matt!![]()
Pretty bitter, but almost on par with Listerine.![]()
Perhaps the military processes have changed since my time of service in the 80s.
Actually, it was originally Czar (corruption of Cesar) and in Slavic tongue was spelled Tsar.
I was just going to ask if this might be the case. I remember it was in the '80s when all the reports of military overspending came to the fore. Perhaps that is the very reason for all the safeguards in place now.
I would have loved to serve in the 80's. The Air force was nearly 5 times larger during the Reagan era. I think that big spending is precisely why things are the way they are.
In the Navy, it was no picnic. They crammed more guys on our ship than it was designed to carry. This was so we would have the personnel to man our rapidly-expanding fleet. Many of these ships were later scrapped, at a cost of many more millions. My "old" ship, the USS Mississippi, a nuclear-powered cruiser built in the 70s, is now on this very expensive scrap heap.