Before you dismiss me as a barbarian, I'll preface this by saying I'm a huge fan of vinyl (and analog over digital in general). I had a faithfull Linn Sondek turntable and an unbelievable Sutherland phono stage, which was as good as anything I've heard. Having said that, I prefer digital.
Analog can be as good as digital, but every single time you listen to it it's not as good as it was the time before. For better or worse, digital solves the problem of archiving. And although the first digital releases were poor, at best, modern audiophile recordings are nothing short of amazing. If you haven't experienced some of the better releases from companies such as Mobile Fidelity, Reference Recordings (perhaprs the best), Telarc, et al, you're missing something. If you listen to, say, Dorian's scary version of Mussorgsky's Pictures, (organ transcription by Jean Guillou), you'll hear a dynamic range and power that you may not have thought possible.
I applaud all of those who keep the vinyl flame aglow, but I'm just not buying any more.
I'd hate for this to digress into a typical audio forum squabble, so I will just put in that, IMHO, and IMS (In My System), the best analog is better than the best digital. It's more work to get there, but the result is worth it (to me). That doesn't mean that digital hasn't come a long way in the last 25 years, it has, and I do listen to cd's regularly, but vinyl playback has also improved, and modern lps can be stunning. If you exercise proper record care and hygiene (wet cleaning, proper storage, etc.), it will be a lifetime before a record played on a high quality turntable deteriorates to the point where it is missing as much information as was left out of the cd in the first place.
Enjoy!