- Thread starter
- #141
I got my answer. I’m unsubscribing. Y’all have fun.
wow, easy now..! I asked about location ("Ukraine"), relative to preparedness (for "the worst"). I don't think that is unreasonable, whether judged in terms of statistics or otherwise. After all, even "America" (and Canada) is a big and diverse country.Yet with the exact same logic, you aren't paranoid preparing for a bear in the woods? Hasn't happened yet? So why do you care about making sure your shotgun is with you? Why do you not consider that logic, hypocritical? Could it be, because we can assume, you probably have personal knowledge of others being attacked by a bear?
If so, why not extend the same reasonable assumption, that some might have the same personal knowledge of being attacked in a vulnerable state in their own homes? And they, just like you, want the freedom to decide which area of their life to be prepared for? It amazes me, that you don't think you deserve ridicule for carrying a shotgun for protection against bears, which have a much better record of not being aggressive murders than humans do, yet you feel like someone who decides differently than you of where to apply their standards of protection and preparedness deserves your ridicule?
Seems quite hypocritical of you, just saying. I personally think, you are not paranoid for preparing to not be eaten by a bear in the woods, however slim that may be. you want to be in reach of a gun for something that has never happened. So does he?
What about that can you not understand? Is it simply because, since you don't have the right in Canada, you don't think we should in America?
... and happily get by without firearmsThis one may help: Danes have one of world’s highest burglary rates
As I just wrote, you're missing the point. I am not anti-gun ....! It's not a simple matter of for or against, or US based on not .... You are allowed to think. (I should hope).It makes me wonder if B&B should have an anti-gun forum so those of that opinion have a great place to go and get support
so I will not contribute any further to this volatile thread
This is a old post but I want to ask, do you live in a condo?......Now I gotta get some buckshot.
Wait, what? We got off the same page at some point or something was lost in translation because I absolutely am pro gun. The last 4 years in particular has firmly galvanized my already pro-RTBA stance.Not at all, I'm just an honest ***** by nature of my personality. However, I didn't say anything rude or overly butt kissing in my post. It's just all plain speak dude? You don't seem to fret much when you speak plainly? So please don't fret when I do?
I can agree with this. Do you agree, all burglar's who desire to enter a locked and secured home, have to be entered by forcing their way in? Seems to just simply be a natural part of the nature and act of a burglary doesn't it? Again, I probably won't get an honest and straight answer, but I will pose this question again, since you seem to be bouncing around it. What was your point of property theft being the majority of the largest percentage of burglaries, have to do with this thread on what weapon choice would people choose during a home intrusion?
Ya know, inquiring minds and all?
I implied that gathering your loved ones if needed into a single protected room, while watching the door with a loaded firearm; or finding a choke point between the bad guys and those loved ones with a loaded firearm, is passive? I don't think so...
You think grabbing a firearm, calling the police and waiting in a protected room is a passive act? I ain't the smartest guy in the world, but I think you saying that action "is passive" speaks more about you then it does me? Just sayin.
What is objectively false? And what reasons have you already stated? This is my point, you haven't made a single clear point about anything you stated? Either clearly agree, or clearly disagree, but just be clear? are you attempting to make the point a firearm isn't needed? Just be clear? I know I would appreciate it?
A handful of exceptions regarding what? I still don't understand the specific point you are wanting me to get without being clear and concise in your attempt? Please be clear of what you are pointing out sir? Or would being clear in a pro gun forum be difficult for you?
your analogy doesn't make any sense and is a moot attempt when you haven't once been clear about your stance?
I absolutely agree good sir. It is quite silly, to come to this forum, if you don't support the idea of having a firearm to protect oneself in a thread titled of what firearm would we use in a home intrusion. I knew we could eventually agree with each other if we just kept trying.
I would like to hear more about your points of what we know is more likely to bring swift resolution in most cases? Please elaborate?
Again, I absolutely agree! That's two for two! We just might become good friends!
In the USA, we get to plan and proceed to fortify and strengthen our homes exterior's with strong doors and windows which forces someone who would attempt to gain entry, to take much more of a difficult, pain staking time than usual, in order to gain entry, which then allows the free American inside to obtain their firearm of choice, call 911 to get the police coming and gather themselves and any loved ones into a secure location inside and wait for the police to arrive or attempt to blast the invaders to oblivion once they get inside. whichever comes first. I'm pretty sure I have stated this logic several times before here?
I apologize sir, that you have not once, made any clear point of substance, in making me understand how those actions are cowering instead of intelligent? Sorry.
I think @jar_ said it best; My children will be with me and my wife cowering, in a place of advantage and fortification behind my 12 gauge shotgun. this place will be of my choosing to help keep everyone safe for either the police to get there first and do their jobs, just like in every other country in the world or; this place of strategic location, will also help me with the ability and advantage to stack up bad guys on the floor, in order to protect my family if the police fail to get there on time. Not like, every other country in the world? Don't hate, appreciate!
Which is my God given right as a free American. "USA!, USa!, Usa!, usa!" and all that stuff...
Rightly so, you can and should teach them what to do during a home invasion, but few plans survive first contact with the enemy.Style points decorate tombstones.
Yup. Folk are free to disrespect, damage and steal your home and property. That's why I have insurance. And when there were family and kids all those decades ago, I taught them to gather & cower in the corner behind me.
wow, easy now..!
I asked about location ("Ukraine"), relative to preparedness (for "the worst").
You don't think what is unreasonable?I don't think that is unreasonable, whether judged in terms of statistics or otherwise. After all, even "America" (and Canada) is a big and diverse country.
As for "paranoia" -- for my part, that was not about ridicule
-- look up the definition of that concept, and judge for yourself whether it might apply to "a state of mind", without taking context into consideration (as you framed it).
As for bears -- since you ask, yes I have actually been attacked. No contact, because psychology is everything in bear/human encounters. We were three guys with guns, standing our ground (preferring not to kill the bear and already having a thousand pounds of bull moose on the ground to deal with), and the bear buggered off eventually. but I'm telling you, it was coming at us..!! That is by no means my only bear encounter.
All I'm saying here is, I would not want to live in that state of mind
I was in then, every day, in the shower, etc. If want to -- be my guest, and may you find peace of mind.
In contrast to what you may think, I have nothing against guns per se, and I quite appreciate, in general terms of cultural rounding, the fondness pertaining among some in the US for the second amendment to the US constitution. In some respects, I share in it.
All I am saying is, there is an element of context which I think is worth taking into consideration. So framing my comment in terms of "Ukraine" was not accidental.
I sense the potential for a "flame war" in this discussion here is considerable, so I will not contribute any further to this volatile thread ... to begin with, all I really wanted was to share my fondness for the Remington 870. There you have it.
Yeah, scary. I guess perhaps regulars in this forum are more used to being under verbal attack. Debate can become so polarized, for or against, then it becomes near impossible to have a "debate" in the sense of having an actual exchange of thought, that stands a chance of moving somewhere, as opposed to merely exchanging punches and preserving status quo. But what brought me here was to share, not to shame. I like my guns too. I don't dress up with them every day though. I probably would if lived in UkraineFunny, we are thinking this exact same thing about you? The difference? We live in this pro gun sub forum and you just got here?