I like them both. They're the same...or are they?
I like them both. They're the same...or are they?
It's just corn. An over produced crop. What's the expense?
Polenta is for people who feel they are above grits
It's hominy corn meal, one yellow and one white. Polenta is generally finer and is cooked with stock and often milk. Grits are coarser and made with water.
It's hominy corn meal, one yellow and one white. Polenta is generally finer and is cooked with stock and often milk. Grits are coarser and made with water.
CPT & Dave:Been a while since we made polenta but it usually has a pretty good quantity of cheese, say Parmigiano-Reggiano in it.
dave
I've also seen polenta cooked in a loaf pan, sliced and fried. That's good eating, too.
They are different animals. Sure, they're related--cousins, really--but they are different. It's only the typical, sad, U.S. sort of marketing that has blurred the distinction. Even still, don't tell me you wouldn't be taken aback for a moment if you ordered one and got the other. The main distinction, beyond some cultural treatment, is the main ingredient.
Classical polenta is made from hard, flint corn , while grits are made from softer, dent corn. Polenta does not need to be made from hominy (alkaline treated corn) meal, but grits are. There is no classic distinction between "grits" and "hominy grits"; that's a very, VERY modern development. The yellow/white corn distinction isn't so important, as plenty of pots of yellow grits have been made over the ages. You made grits with what corn you had, and some grits-making areas grew yellow corn.
Both can include other ingredients, but adding something other than salt, pepper, and/or butter to grits is something that really only occurred in one or two small regions and has now caught on all over the place. Don't get me wrong, now. I have nothing at all against adding all sorts of other goodies to grits, but (for the most part) it's a relatively modern development.
Polenta is for people who feel they are above grits