I had high hopes for this one, given the description and my general fondness for Truefitt & Hill products (if not necessarily all of their fragrances), but alas, it’s a disappointment. Truefitt claims this new-ish offering is “a sophisticated fragrance…as modern as it is classic.” I suppose that’s a nice way of saying it doesn’t know what it wants to be. To me, it’s not sophisticated at all. In fact, I find it to be banal department store fare, utterly average, and not at all in keeping with the cachet and heritage of a renowned, “old school” brand.
The closest thing I can compare this Sandalwood to is Ralph Lauren’s Safari for Men, from 1992. Think sharp, synthetic citrus and florals laid over synthetic woods and leather, with a synthetic marine/calone note somewhere in the mix. Did I mention it smells synthetic? Modern, perhaps, if 1992 counts as modern, but certainly not classic, unless 1992 counts as classic. Take your pick, but I don’t think T&H can have it both ways.
Longevity and sillage are either outstanding or obnoxious, depending on your point of view. I didn’t even spray this directly on me. I sprayed a tester strip with a single spritz, let it dry for about ten seconds, then pressed it to the back of my hand. Three-plus hours and a hand-washing or two later, and it’s still going strong. If you like it, consider it good value, since you won’t have to use a lot, but please be considerate of those around you and use restraint when spraying. They'll thank you for it.
Price and packaging are the same as all other T&H fragrances – certainly not cheap, but not the most expensive things out there, either. You would spend about as much, and smell about the same, if you visited your local department store fragrance counter. Perhaps the scent takes on new life when used in the shaving cream, aftershave balm or bath soap, all of which are offered as part of the Sandalwood range. However, given my experience with the cologne, there is no way I would purchase those other products without trying samples first. You'd be well advised to do the same.
Side note: I had intended to post this in the Review section, but could not figure out how to initiate a product review. If anyone has any tips, please share. Thanks.
The closest thing I can compare this Sandalwood to is Ralph Lauren’s Safari for Men, from 1992. Think sharp, synthetic citrus and florals laid over synthetic woods and leather, with a synthetic marine/calone note somewhere in the mix. Did I mention it smells synthetic? Modern, perhaps, if 1992 counts as modern, but certainly not classic, unless 1992 counts as classic. Take your pick, but I don’t think T&H can have it both ways.
Longevity and sillage are either outstanding or obnoxious, depending on your point of view. I didn’t even spray this directly on me. I sprayed a tester strip with a single spritz, let it dry for about ten seconds, then pressed it to the back of my hand. Three-plus hours and a hand-washing or two later, and it’s still going strong. If you like it, consider it good value, since you won’t have to use a lot, but please be considerate of those around you and use restraint when spraying. They'll thank you for it.
Price and packaging are the same as all other T&H fragrances – certainly not cheap, but not the most expensive things out there, either. You would spend about as much, and smell about the same, if you visited your local department store fragrance counter. Perhaps the scent takes on new life when used in the shaving cream, aftershave balm or bath soap, all of which are offered as part of the Sandalwood range. However, given my experience with the cologne, there is no way I would purchase those other products without trying samples first. You'd be well advised to do the same.
Side note: I had intended to post this in the Review section, but could not figure out how to initiate a product review. If anyone has any tips, please share. Thanks.
Last edited: