What's new

RazoRock Cyber Razor II

It appears to be similar in head design to the Henson. Wonder how they compare?

I've had all 3 Henson's razors and I didn't like any of them. I found the + and ++ to be too mild for me. The +++ for some reason I could not get a smooth shave with it. The Cyber razor to me is a superior design. It has become my go-to razor and believe me I have tried just about every razor out there.

Ace_Nivea.jpg
 
Yeah, the Cyber is very smooth yet gives a very close shave. It kind of reminds me of the OneBlade razor that cost $300. only the Cyber is only $40.00.
 
I was just looking very closely at the Cyber's head and I noticed that the top cap and base plate slope inward toward the gap like this very terrible sketch:
RR Cyber.jpg

It is exaggerated here to show the point, but the shave plane (orange line) is not the same as the slope of the two plates. I thought this might be the case and I had to look very carefully to see that it seems to be. If you hold a straight edge up to the face of the razor, you can see this. The blade gap is in a tiny valley.

Putting in a blade, it seems that the edge of the blade sticks out to at least neutral or a little bit positive of the shave plane. If it was just in line with the bottom edge of the top cap, it would be negative. Using a cardstock test, a Nacet seems to be just a tiny bit positive, as it can bite into the paper.

With this in mind, the design is a bit different than other heads which may look similar at first glance. Would you fellow Cyber owners take a very close look and double check what I see, please?
 
I was just looking very closely at the Cyber's head and I noticed that the top cap and base plate slope inward toward the gap like this very terrible sketch:

It is exaggerated here to show the point, but the shave plane (orange line) is not the same as the slope of the two plates. I thought this might be the case and I had to look very carefully to see that it seems to be. If you hold a straight edge up to the face of the razor, you can see this. The blade gap is in a tiny valley.

Putting in a blade, it seems that the edge of the blade sticks out to at least neutral or a little bit positive of the shave plane. If it was just in line with the bottom edge of the top cap, it would be negative. Using a cardstock test, a Nacet seems to be just a tiny bit positive, as it can bite into the paper.

With this in mind, the design is a bit different than other heads which may look similar at first glance. Would you fellow Cyber owners take a very close look and double check what I see, please?
Yep, I noticed this in mine as well, mild and medium.
I suspect it's either a happy accident or a measure to reduce drag some people perceive, all the while still performing the function of an angle guide.
 
I was just looking very closely at the Cyber's head and I noticed that the top cap and base plate slope inward toward the gap like this very terrible sketch:

It is exaggerated here to show the point, but the shave plane (orange line) is not the same as the slope of the two plates. I thought this might be the case and I had to look very carefully to see that it seems to be. If you hold a straight edge up to the face of the razor, you can see this. The blade gap is in a tiny valley.

Putting in a blade, it seems that the edge of the blade sticks out to at least neutral or a little bit positive of the shave plane. If it was just in line with the bottom edge of the top cap, it would be negative. Using a cardstock test, a Nacet seems to be just a tiny bit positive, as it can bite into the paper.

With this in mind, the design is a bit different than other heads which may look similar at first glance. Would you fellow Cyber owners take a very close look and double check what I see, please?

I'm glad you pointed this out, but I must be brain dead because I don't see it. Still an interesting fact.
 

Iridian

Cool and slimy
Maybe we should compare side photos of both mild and medium head if there is a difference, or if just the base is different.
 
Top Bottom