Brett, LOL.
Adam, the major critique I have (well, had) of Method Shaving/RMWS is that until very recently (via Joel's exposé and the new MethodShaving.com site) it was not possible to learn how to use the method without a trip to Austin, or secondhand lessons from a devotee.
CR's essays only inflamed the issue (and I'm a wordsmith at heart--the man takes circumlocutions to a new level of artistry), because they give the impression of hiding the need to pay an entry fee to get the knowledge. The need to pay would have been fine, if it had been the case, but then just having said so would have cleared things up. Instead CR positioned himself as the Messiah of Frustrated Shavers Everywhere, and then appeared to withhold the keys to the kingdom--but not say he was doing so outright.
I've read and reread the essays and a number of shorter publications on the RMWS (and perused at great length the brush diagrams, cutting forms, etc.), and it wasn't until I saw Joel's pictorial, and had used a brush myself for several months, that I could truly get what the "bucket" or "canopy" might be, where the "breech" was, how the "shoulder" worked, and similar things. Even pretty fundamental concepts like "up position" (is that bristles-up, lifted-up-by-handle [bristles down], or just lifted-up-from-palm?), "open-breech position," "charging the brush" and "locking the breech" don't make a lot of sense in and of themselves.
ANYWAY, thankfully the info blockade has ceased, and getting access to the basics of the method is looking easier all the time. In my opinion striving for greater clarity and transparency is the best possible thing Method Shaving/RMWS can do for itself.
Rant off.
I'm really looking forward to getting the products. Thanks for participating here!
-Rich
Adam, the major critique I have (well, had) of Method Shaving/RMWS is that until very recently (via Joel's exposé and the new MethodShaving.com site) it was not possible to learn how to use the method without a trip to Austin, or secondhand lessons from a devotee.
CR's essays only inflamed the issue (and I'm a wordsmith at heart--the man takes circumlocutions to a new level of artistry), because they give the impression of hiding the need to pay an entry fee to get the knowledge. The need to pay would have been fine, if it had been the case, but then just having said so would have cleared things up. Instead CR positioned himself as the Messiah of Frustrated Shavers Everywhere, and then appeared to withhold the keys to the kingdom--but not say he was doing so outright.
I've read and reread the essays and a number of shorter publications on the RMWS (and perused at great length the brush diagrams, cutting forms, etc.), and it wasn't until I saw Joel's pictorial, and had used a brush myself for several months, that I could truly get what the "bucket" or "canopy" might be, where the "breech" was, how the "shoulder" worked, and similar things. Even pretty fundamental concepts like "up position" (is that bristles-up, lifted-up-by-handle [bristles down], or just lifted-up-from-palm?), "open-breech position," "charging the brush" and "locking the breech" don't make a lot of sense in and of themselves.
ANYWAY, thankfully the info blockade has ceased, and getting access to the basics of the method is looking easier all the time. In my opinion striving for greater clarity and transparency is the best possible thing Method Shaving/RMWS can do for itself.
Rant off.
I'm really looking forward to getting the products. Thanks for participating here!
-Rich