He would have done it, too. The Iroquois Indians called him Town Destroyer for a reason.
After invading Iraq, the U.S. forces were paying rewards to Iraqis who turned in "bad guys". Now, if you have a grudge against your neighbor, owe him money or something, what better way to get rid of him than accusing him to the Americans? You get rid of him and pick up a nice chunk of change. Furthermore, if someone's only "crime" was fighting against the foreign (American) troops who have invaded his country, what should be the punishment for that? Wouldn't you do the same thing if China or whoever invaded the U.S.? We need fair trials to sort out the guilty from those who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time or whatever. And don't tell me how "nice" the prison is. To be snatched up, taken away from your familoy anf friends, and locked up for years with no chance to speak out is a horrible abuse of human rights, anyway you cut it. And I don't give a damn if evidence is "classified". Too often classifying things is just a convenient way to hide wrongdoing.
I mark this as the point where this turned into mud slinging fueled by ignorance and closed mindedness.
Obviously this person knows more about detainee proceedures at point of capture than anyone else here, especially me.
I'm stepping back to just watch now.