- Thread starter
- #1,401
This is the Tiger Platinum, which is made by Czech Blades S. R. O in their Jevíčko Czechia plant. This firm produces most of the white label blades for European brands, so this and their Tatras are important OEM blades. They are less expensive than the private label versions, so they are the only blades marked "made in EU," "made in Europe," "made in cz," or "made in Czech Republic" that should ever be considered for trial or purchase. We tested this blade previously in July, 2024. At that time, there was some concern that it may not have been a good representation of the specification due to poor performance. Unfortunately, this one, which is from a different purchase lot, shares very similar poor performance to the other, including poor balance, durability, and consistency, along with a mild and primitive grind. At least we have some confirmation, and the addition of scalable micrographs and other measurements.
The polymer and metallic coatings are visible. The grind is rough, and the performance of the steel is poor, with lots of large chipping after the test.
What does it say about a manufacturer when they produce two blades to the same specification, and both are very similar, including poor balance of sharpness from one edge to the other? I am sure there are still sharper and duller ones out there, but I don't think any of the mild stainless Tiger spec blades are worth purchasing.
Performance of the better top edge is similar to the overall performance of the Razolution blade, so I suspect that Razolution remains a better representation of this same nominal specification.
Blade Sharpness Test Index
The polymer and metallic coatings are visible. The grind is rough, and the performance of the steel is poor, with lots of large chipping after the test.
What does it say about a manufacturer when they produce two blades to the same specification, and both are very similar, including poor balance of sharpness from one edge to the other? I am sure there are still sharper and duller ones out there, but I don't think any of the mild stainless Tiger spec blades are worth purchasing.
Performance of the better top edge is similar to the overall performance of the Razolution blade, so I suspect that Razolution remains a better representation of this same nominal specification.
Date | 9-Feb-2025 | Mass, mg | 512 | Thickness, microns | 90 |
Blade | Czech Blades SRO | Tiger | Platinum | Czechia | 1-Jan-2024 |
Wear on Edge | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
Edges Measured | Bottom / Top | Bottom / Top | Bottom / Top | Bottom / Top | Bottom / Top |
Measurement Medium | Stren 4 .21 | Stren 4 .21 | Stren 4 .21 | Stren 4 .21 | Stren 4 .21 |
Dulling Substrate | New | Paper | Paper | Paper | Paper |
Measurements | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Adj. Std. Dev. | 25 | 19 | 22 | 11 | 16 |
Median F (g) | 63.5 | 72 | 81 | 106 | 109.5 |
Mean F (g) Top | 55 | 65 | 73 | 100 | 96 |
Mean F (g) Bottom | 81 | 82 | 99 | 106 | 109 |
Mean F (g) | 68 | 74 | 86 | 103 | 102 |
BESS Adj. Factor | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 |
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top | 77 | 90 | 101 | 139 | 133 |
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom | 113 | 114 | 137 | 147 | 151 |
Median Adj. F (g) | 88 | 100 | 113 | 147 | 152 |
Mean Adj. F (g) | 95 | 102 | 119 | 143 | 142 |
Blade Sharpness Test Index