What's new

Blade Sharpness Research Project

I tested the Rapira Swedish Supersteel blade from Mostochlegmash in Moscow, Russia, the producer of Rapira, Ladas, and Voskhod blades. I have been interested in testing this, because I really like its sharper cousin, the Voskhod.

It comes in a cellophane wrapped cardboard tuck.

1000009955.jpg


The blades are double wrapped with some small weak glue dots, and printed outer paper.
1000009957.jpg


Chat GPT says there probably isn't a date code in there.
1000009959.jpg


There is a thick and heavy distal coating.
1000009960.jpg


Coating and Grind
Coating ThicknessThick
Coating EvennessTypical
Bevel Coating Coverage43%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.546
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.004
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyTypical
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.100
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.170
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.002
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineTypical
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.000
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizeNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineNA

After testing, we see some small chipping along the bottom edge, which is typical for razor steels. The secondary bevel has a smooth polish, and the scratches on the primary bevel are medium and fairly even. It is the same grind as the Rapira Platinum Lux, which was tested previously.
1000009962.jpg


I shaved with one of these today. The blade I shaved with is from a different tuck and probably a different batch from the one I used for the paper cut sharpness test. I imagine the ones used for the cut test are a slightly sharper batch. Subjectively, I would say it felt moderate to mild, but comfortable, and perhaps slightly sharper than measured. I attribute this to the smooth polish on the secondary bevel. I could feel the blade in my Blackbird Ti, but it didn't tug; I could just tell it was there and feel it on the hairs and skin.

Date28-8-2024



BladeMostochlegmashRapiraSwedish SupersteelRussia01-01-2022
Wear on Edge0369121
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaperFace
Measurements202020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.9111436388
Median F (g)54.55463.5678171.5
Mean F (g) Top50556910211272
Mean F (g) Bottom545763616268
Mean F (g)525666818770
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top60678412413788
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom656976757683
Median Adj. F (g)676677829987
Mean Adj. F (g)6368809910785

The top edge of this one started to fail catastrophically after the second set of paper cutting, skewing the green and orange bars upward a bit. If this hadn't happened, it would look much more similar to the Rapira Platinum Lux. The sharpness is very similar. The coatings are obviously different, this one is much heavier than the Platinum, but I think the grind is the same. It wouldn't surprise me if the steel were also the same.

1724868059603.png


I find sharper blades to be more comfortable than this one, but this one more comfortable than other blades close to it in sharpness like PearlMax, JiFuli and Vikings.

1724868392476.png

I enjoy shaving with these blades. It is a shame they are becoming scarce in global markets. They are fairly expensive now, and I think there are better options in the price range. It is a nice blade to have if you want something mild and already bought it a few months or years ago, but I don't recommend buying it at the current prices.

Blade Sharpness Test Index
 
This seems like a running theme with some of these manufacturers, grind them within a micron of a wire edge and slop a heavy coating on them to try to dampen that sharpness. It really highlights how much more sophisticated some other blades are. Still, at their low cost they work for some people. I appreciate the addition subjective commentary on shaving with them.
The timing has worked out well for the last few with my shaving and testing paces being reasonably well matched. I am going to be too busy to be doing many tests again at the beginning of September. It is nice to be able to put some subjective information with an individual blade that has actually been measured. I will keep doing it when the timing works out.
 
The timing has worked out well for the last few with my shaving and testing paces being reasonably well matched. I am going to be too busy to be doing many tests again at the beginning of September. It is nice to be able to put some subjective information with an individual blade that has actually been measured. I will keep doing it when the timing works out.

Thanks again for all you do!
 
This is the Chinese market Schick Comfort Germany blade. I got it on Ali Express from the UPONMOON Store for $3.98 plus shipping. It ended up being $7/5 with shipping. Now I see it for $3.46 with Choice shipping option, which is a lot better, but still $70/100. It seems to be the same blade as the South African market German Schick, though these ones are a bit sharper, and the coating looks different. This one has a distal coating, and the other one had a full bevel coating. The change doesn't appear to affect the wear curve. This one comes in a blister pack. I bet the better protection from this packaging is why it was sharper.

1000009963.jpg


1000009964.jpg


1000009965.jpg


The surface finish on the steel matches the South Africa market one.
1000009966.jpg


The peculiar cuts on the cardboard and paper match the South African market one.
1000009969.jpg


1000009968.jpg


Coating and Grind
Coating ThicknessThick
Coating EvennessTypical
Bevel Coating Coverage44%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.421
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.003
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyTypical
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.102
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.187
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.002
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineTypical
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.000
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizeNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineNA

1000009971.jpg


Date28-8-2024


BladeEdgewellSchick ChinaComfort GermanyGermany01-01-2023
Wear on Edge036912
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaper
Measurements2020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.98141520
Median F (g)4746444346.5
Mean F (g) Top4144504960
Mean F (g) Bottom5346434645
Mean F (g)4745474753
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top5054615973
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom6556535655
Median Adj. F (g)5756545257
Mean Adj. F (g)5855575864

The wear curve matches the South African market one.
1724878397656.png


1724878227854.png


I just got this out of curiosity. I am satisfied that it is substantially the same blade as the South African market one. If you are in Asia, this might be good news. If you are in the US, you should just get the other one from The Razor Company for less money. It is an excellent German blade.

Blade Sharpness Test Index
 
I tested the Elios Platinum Swedish Steel Inoxidable blade, which is another Italian-branded blade produced by Lord in Egypt like the Bolzano. This blade is thinner than the Bolzano, at 0.090mm compared to the more standard 0.099mm.

Except for the graphic design and the capacity of 11 blades to a tuck, the packaging is the same as Bolzano and other Lord blades.

1000009975.jpg


1000009976.jpg


1000009978.jpg


It looks like the only difference in the grind is due to the thickness of the steel, with the same specs and angles on the belts.

Coating and GrindEliosBolzano
Coating ThicknessThickThick
Coating EvennessSloppySloppy
Bevel Coating Coverage32%49%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.3870.401
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.0040.004
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyUnevenUneven
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEvenEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.0900.099
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.1530.158
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.0020.003
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyUnevenUneven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineUnevenUneven
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.0000.000
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizeNANA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyNANA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineNANA

1000009979.jpg


Date28-8-2024


BladeLordElios PlatinumSwedish SteelEgypt01-01-2023
Wear on Edge036912
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaper
Measurements2020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.537814
Median F (g)45465049.554.5
Mean F (g) Top4346535462
Mean F (g) Bottom4848495051
Mean F (g)4547515257
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top5356646676
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom5859606162
Median Adj. F (g)5556616067
Mean Adj. F (g)5557626469

It is hard to say if the only difference in the steel is the thickness, which would be enough to explain how Elios starts off slightly sharper and is less durable than the thicker Bolzano. If the alloys are different, I don't think it is very significant.

The Bolzano may have a chrome coating, since it has a j-shaped wear curve like most of the chrome Lords, while the platinum coated Elios has more linear-exponential degradation characteristic of the platinum Lord blades.

Regardless, the Bolzano is more durable, while the Elios starts off sharper. Among Lord's Shark blades, I had a strong preference for the Super Chrome over the platinum and SS. Unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to try the Elios yet.

1724902526934.png



1724903069262.png


Unlike the expensive Bolzano, the Elios is available for $10/110 from Razor Blades Club on Amazon, so if you like sharp-moderate Lord blades, especially the thin ones or platinum ones, this might be worth trying.

Blade Sharpness Test Index
 

Attachments

  • 1724902278707.png
    1724902278707.png
    33.1 KB · Views: 35
EDIT: I just looked at the test and realize it is a different Silver Star (or is it? It's made in Egypt. Dunno)

I haven't tried Silver Star yet - but the Lord Super Chromes I bought recently seem very sharp and so many threads in the forum here say Silver Star is even sharper. But if you look at the master graph in this thread, you'll find Silver Star down there as the 6th worst blade tested. There must be some variance between batches of blades. I have a few tucks of Voskhod blades that cannot possibly be the same Voskod blades that scored so high in these tests.

i also really wonder about Silver Stars. Just tested one and can confirm the results in this test, they are just not very sharp, similar to maybe a Tiger Platinum, which is also not very sharp (as this test also confirms)
So i really wonder, why are many people liking this blade and think this is the best from Lord? All Lords are sharper (confirmed in this test)
Are there different Silver Stars or a huge variance between batches? Mine says Sotraco on the back, made in Egypt in Port-Said.
 
i also really wonder about Silver Stars. Just tested one and can confirm the results in this test, they are just not very sharp, similar to maybe a Tiger Platinum, which is also not very sharp (as this test also confirms)
So i really wonder, why are many people liking this blade and think this is the best from Lord? All Lords are sharper (confirmed in this test)
Are there different Silver Stars or a huge variance between batches? Mine says Sotraco on the back, made in Egypt in Port-Said.
Mine do too. The brands are both Soliman Holding Group owned.

1000009996.jpg

I have been making an assumption on some of the other Egyptian SHG produced blades not marked Port Said, that they are Alexandria blades.
 
i also really wonder about Silver Stars. Just tested one and can confirm the results in this test, they are just not very sharp, similar to maybe a Tiger Platinum, which is also not very sharp (as this test also confirms)
Are there different Silver Stars or a huge variance between batches? Mine says Sotraco on the back, made in Egypt in Port-Said.
The dull Silver Star test surprised me to be honest. I like them far more than any Tiger/Tatra. Subjectively agree on the durability data though, as well as most of the general pecking order.

I would have placed Silver Stars on the line between top and middle thirds. At least solidly in the middle. But they do not vary that much and the numbers don't lie. Will continue to happily use these dull blades, along with a few other favorites that are all over the graph. Objective data is important and helpful, but your face is still the umpire.

Mine do too. The brands are both Soliman Holding Group owned.
Same here. Tuck barcode 6 222001 552942 whatever that means. Purchased winter 2024. Happy to send some if you ever circle back to these in the year 2035.
 
I tested the Lord Asco Super Stainless blade from Soliman Holding Group of Egypt. It comes in typical Lord packaging, with nicely printed cardboard tuck and color printed plasticized paper wrappers containing four wax dots.

1000010020.jpg


It was packaged in November, 2023.

1000010022.jpg


Like the Bolzano, the packaging of the tuck is defective, with glue between the wrappers and the tuck itself. This one was worse than Bolzano, though, with some visible damage to the wrappers inside.

I started the test with the one that seemed to be in the best condition. It was performing very poorly through the first set of measurements and into the second set. I scrapped that blade and re-started the procedure with the blade that had the next best looking wrapper.
1000010019.jpg


1000010027.jpg



Coating and Grind
Coating ThicknessThick
Coating EvennessSloppy
Bevel Coating Coverage57%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.407
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.003
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyUneven
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.090
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.228
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.002
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyUneven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineUneven
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.000
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizeNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineNA


This one has their 0.090mm steel, which is thinner than the standard 0.100mm. The steel didn't hold up to the testing procedure. Both edges presented dead spots early in the test and got worse from there. The bottom edge was much duller and performed significantly worse than the top edge.

After testing, we see the bottom edge has lots of large denting. It is strange they would use soft steel on a thin blade. I suppose if they don't last long then they can sell more of them.
1000010031.jpg


There is a big variance between the edges, but even the sharper top edge was mild and had poor durability. If both edges had been like the top edge then the ranking would be near JiFuli.

Date29-8-2024


BladeLordAscoSuper StainlessEgypt11-02-2023
Wear on Edge036912
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaper
Measurements2020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.2640404138
Median F (g)547897.5100.5111
Mean F (g) Top5158736273
Mean F (g) Bottom71104115124122
Mean F (g)6181949398
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top6271897689
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom87126140151149
Median Adj. F (g)6695119123135
Mean Adj. F (g)7599114114119

Well, it actually did better than the Lord Silver Star I tested previously, but I should test both of them again at some point when I have gotten through more blades from my backlog. For the time being, there are more interesting questions than how a properly made batch of blades is from a company that has produced several bad blades ended up in my possession.

1724955644661.png


1724955771435.png


Blade Sharpness Test Index
 
This is a wonderful scientific approach which is objective and supported by subjective usage... kudos to the OP for some amazing work.

As an SE user could we use the same methodologies for measuring some of the AC blades... happy to provide samples as required.
It would be easy to adapt, except for the guard blades, which would likely present the same challenges as the Gutche double edge blade I tested. Basically I would just measure the one edge in an AC shavette and evaluate the one edge. I recently ordered a Feather kamisori shavette from a Japanese seller for that purpose. Hopefully I can test some of them before the end of September.

I am hoping one or two of you has like a dozen different un-guarded blades in their dispensers, and can pack them all well in a box, send them to me, and let me work my way through them over a few months, using 1-3 blades from each dispenser, and then I can return what's left to the owner. If that sounds like you, send me a PM in about two weeks, and we can set something up.
 
If you are sick of Soliman Holding Group Lord blades, then I have good news; this OK Super Stainless is the last one here currently. This was another poor performer such that I started measuring one, and switched to another one because the results were so bad on the first one. The second one was better, but not good.

It is the same package as the others, with different printing.

1000010036.jpg


1000010039.jpg


1000010040.jpg


This glass grid is great for measurements, but I don't think I like looking at it on top of the blade. I couldn't figure out a good way to get it in focus when I tried putting it below the blade. I may need to build some kind of fixture to get it to work from below. It is easy to get confident micrometer accuracy with this scale, so I will figure it out. I may just take three pictures each time and scale the overlaid one when practical, and the underlain one when the overlaid one doesn't show what I am measuring.
1000010041.jpg


Coating and Grind
Coating ThicknessThick
Coating EvennessSloppy
Bevel Coating Coverage37%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.407
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.004
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyUneven
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.093
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.255
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.002
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyUneven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineUneven
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.000
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizeNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyNA
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineNA

I took the after pic with the old plastic grid. There is lots of small and medium shipping along the edge.
1000010042.jpg


Date29-8-2024


BladeLordOKSuper StainlessEgypt01-01-2023
Wear on Edge036912
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaper
Measurements2020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.835394041
Median F (g)475364.567.5109.5
Mean F (g) Top4878100111125
Mean F (g) Bottom4851615662
Mean F (g)4864808493
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top5895122135153
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom5962746975
Median Adj. F (g)57647982134
Mean Adj. F (g)597998102114

Initial sharpness was decent. Durability and sharpness were fairly poor.

1724963563362.png


1724963500236.png


Lord obviously has the ability to produce more durable and consistent, better blades than this, so I am not sure what the point of having this one in the lineup would be.

At some point I would like to test the Crown and Racer blades, and probably find another recent batch for the Silver Star and Asco, but for now, I am ready to move on to something else.

Blade Sharpness Test Index
 
...Lord obviously has the ability to produce more durable and consistent, better blades than this, so I am not sure what the point of having this one in the lineup would be...

This brings up a question I've often wondered about concerning blades.

Since manufacturing DE blades is a very mature industry with established companies, everyone in theory has the ability to produce blades as good as Personna Med Prep, for example. Why do they produce so many blades that do not perform nearly as well as those? What is the point?
 
This brings up a question I've often wondered about concerning blades.

Since manufacturing DE blades is a very mature industry with established companies, everyone in theory has the ability to produce blades as good as Personna Med Prep, for example. Why do they produce so many blades that do not perform nearly as well as those? What is the point?
I would guess it is similar to aluminum extrusion production in the sense that very expensive old facilities have no trouble with capacity, but are very reluctant to invest in any capital with so much competition.

Also, most of the blades must go to consumers who are a lot more price sensitive than traditional shaving enthusiasts. I think most DE shavers would probably switch to cartridges if DE blade prices weren't below cartridge prices.

Quality probably isn't that important to most DE shavers. It isn't that hard to get a decent shave with a Tech or Merkur clone, super cheap soap, and a marginal blade. I don't think most actually care about being BBS or anything close to it. They just don't want to be scruffy or bloody.

So there is a lot of demand for cheap blades with marginal performance.

Hopefully growing popularity in developed cpuntry markets and development in developing country markets pushes more companies to make great blades.
 
@WVShaver sent me four more American Personna Comfort Coated Lab Blue blades to test. I measured all of them, but I will put them up individually to stay close to the usual format, skipping some parts to avoid redundancy.

I am starting with the oldest one, which is an Energizer blade from 2015. It seems to be of the same grind as the 2013 Energizer Personna that @Dimitri sent before. This one is sharper and wears much differently, so I think the coating is different.

@WVShaver took some nice pictures of the box.

image7.jpeg


image8.jpeg


Here are the eight four blades as I received them. They are numbered chronologically based on production date and the tests will be posted in the same order. This one is number ".8"
1000010060.jpg


Here are the backs of the blades. 8 is on the upper left, 9 below it, is also an Energizer blade. 10 is on the upper right, and 11, lower right. I really liked the laser engraved production dates on the 2022 and 2023 AccuTec blades I tested. It seems AccuTec may have moved away from this good practice.
1000010061.jpg


The grind looks like the 2013 blade tested previously. The coating is lighter.
1000010062.jpg


Coating and Grind
Coating ThicknessLight
Coating EvennessEven
Bevel Coating Coverage100%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.415
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.003
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.104
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.160
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.001
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineEven
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.054
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizePolish
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineEven

1000010067.jpg


Date30-08-2024


BladeEnergizerPersonnaComfort CoatedUnited States10-10-2015
Wear on Edge036912
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaper
Measurements2020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.647610
Median F (g)4644465052
Mean F (g) Top4942485258
Mean F (g) Bottom4545454849
Mean F (g)4744475054
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top6051586471
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom5555555860
Median Adj. F (g)5654566163
Mean Adj. F (g)5753576166

The wear curve and sharpness are more similar to the new blades than they are to the 2013 Energizer tested previously. The 2016 blade I tested today seems to be of identical construction.
1725039323929.png


1725039684456.png


Blade Sharpness Test Index
 
This is the 2016 American Personna Comfort Coated Lab Blue blade. I don't have pictures of the box, so I am not sure if it is an Energizer blade or an AccuTec blade, but it seems to be made to the same specification as the 2015 Energizer blade reviewed above, so I am assuming it is an Energizer. Maybe one of you can say for sure.

1000010076.jpg

1000010077.jpg


1000010075.jpg


1000010063.jpg


Coating and Grind
Coating ThicknessLight
Coating EvennessEven
Bevel Coating Coverage100%
Entire Bevel to Edge, mm0.429
Primary Bevel Scratch Size0.003
Primary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Primary Bevel Proximal TransitionEven
Blade Thickness, mm0.103
Secondary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.165
Secondary Bevel Scratch Size0.002
Secondary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Secondary Bevel Transition LineEven
Tertiary Bevel Transition to Edge, mm0.049
Tertiary Bevel Scratch SizePolish
Tertiary Bevel Scratch ConsistencyEven
Tertiary Bevel Scratch Transition LineEven

1000010068.jpg


Date30-08-2024


BladeEnergizerPersonnaComfort CoatedUnited States23-02-2016
Wear on Edge036912
Edges MeasuredBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / TopBottom / Top
Measurement MediumStren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22Stren 6 .22
Dulling SubstrateNewPaperPaperPaperPaper
Measurements2020202020
Adj. Std. Dev.44779
Median F (g)5144434951
Mean F (g) Top5043465050
Mean F (g) Bottom5145424851
Mean F (g)5044444951
BESS Adj. Factor1.221.221.221.221.22
Avg. Adj. F (g) Top6153566161
Avg. Adj. F (g) Bottom6255515862
Median Adj. F (g)6254526062
Mean Adj. F (g)6154545962

Blade Sharpness Test Index
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom