I did a search earlier.... and New Arrivals... Nothing... but I did it again just a moment ago and there is was...
Has this new upcoming GOAT already been classified in the RazoRock agressiveness scale?
Between 17-19 is way too much for me. My beloved GC68-P is only 6 and I do love mild razors. Thank you for the info, Sir.
I figured logically it would have to be below 25; German 37 Slant in the Medium category.Has this new upcoming GOAT already been classified for its agressiveness in the RazoRock razor scale?
I just got the email. All the ss handles on deal tooI looked at the IB website... no GOAT... No email here either and I'm on their subscriber list....
According to the scale this GOAT is slightly milder than the GC84-P, but still Medium. Definitely not a mild razor.I figured logically it would have to be below 25; German 37 Slant in the Medium category.
Already having a GC.84P, I may just opt for the .74 plate at year's end; though that may be redundant as it's seemingly tied with the MJ-90
wondering if i should order some blades or wait order from magards for more of a blade samplerI bought one. I’ll follow up with how I believe it compares to the 34c.
Couldn't tell you, Just going with what seemed rational in my mind.I don’t agree with the assessment that their price is set to recoup development costs. Otherwise, all their razors would have a similar higher cost. They copied an existing design, which should keep design costs lower than making a new design from scratch. They priced it accordingly to gain a specific market position based on people’s willingness to pay for it. People will pay for it, so good for them. I will be sitting this one out because at that price, it better not have a “tool”’ finish.
As far as I know, one of the things reflected in the price of a CNC razor is how much material needs to be removed from billet steel to achieve the desired shape (more means more tool wear and processing time), and the GOAT's shape looks like it requires somewhat more complicated CNC programming than e.g. a Game Changer, which has more straight lines.I don’t agree with the assessment that their price is set to recoup development costs. Otherwise, all their razors would have a similar higher cost. They copied an existing design, which should keep design costs lower than making a new design from scratch. They priced it accordingly to gain a specific market position based on people’s willingness to pay for it. People will pay for it, so good for them. I will be sitting this one out because at that price, it better not have a “tool”’ finish.
I haven't tried a 34c, only a 33c, and the Fendrihan MKII head, which I bought shortly after they first released it, is a rougher shaver than the 33c, even at the most shallow angle I coult manage.Couldn't tell you, Just going with what seemed rational in my mind.
Never really been an early adopter so I can't recall whether their previous heads came in higher and reduced over time; but Fendrihan's SS MkII has been out a year and is closer aligned in pricing to the 34c...
Just my opinion, but you can't compare a cast razor to a cnc razor. Totally different build process and different final product in terms of tolerance and quality.Couldn't tell you, Just going with what seemed rational in my mind.
Never really been an early adopter so I can't recall whether their previous heads came in higher and reduced over time; but Fendrihan's SS MkII has been out a year and is closer aligned in pricing to the 34c...
Given the choice - I would definitely take the SS version, though I have absolutely no qualms with the Zamak's that I own.As far as I know, one of the things reflected in the price of a CNC razor is how much material needs to be removed from billet steel to achieve the desired shape (more means more tool wear and processing time), and the GOAT's shape looks like it requires somewhat more complicated CNC programming than e.g. a Game Changer, which has more straight lines.
Additionally, development costs aren't constant and they won't be equal for all razors. That they're using a pre-existing design as inspiration doesn't mean no development costs.
I can't say whether they are trying to squeeze the market for a bit more money, but it actually cheaper than the special edition of the 34C (see e.g. Safety Razor 34C - 650 Years of Solingen - MERKUR Razors - https://merkur-razors.com/produkt/merkur-34c-650-years/?lang=en).
Having said that, it looks like you've made up your mind about it already, so a debate about it is mostly academic.
I am in agreement. I did not take into further research that the MkII was cast and would make for contributing to the lack of smoothness that @Slapo stated.Just my opinion, but you can't compare a cast razor to a cnc razor. Totally different build process and different final product in terms of tolerance and quality.
I'm a 1 on the scale.Between 17-19 is way too much for me. My beloved GC68-P is only 6 and I do love mild razors. Thank you for the info, Sir.
I don't think the issue was with is being cast as much as the changes they'd made compared to Merkur heads.I am in agreement. I did not take into further research that the MkII was cast and would make for contributing to the lack of smoothness that @Slapo stated.