Just wondering...is it better to shave with a less aggressive razor with a sharp blade (e.g. Feather), or a more aggressive razor with a more forgiving blade (e.g. Derby)??? Or is this a YMMV scenario???
IMO you should always use a sharp blade regardless of the tool. Generally speaking, dull tools are much more prone to cause cuts and accidents.
You have a good technique; that levels the playing field with any razor/blade combo. I use Feather and Astra SP and emphasize good face-prep which is very important.Tried a feather for the first time in my R89 tonight.....was pretty much a perfect shave.
I tend to put sharper blades in everything. I get my best smoothest shaves from aggressive razors with sharp blades in them but still love my Techs with Feathers in them.
I never understood the use of blades like the Derby, when I first started I use a single Derby blade then threw out the whole pack.
I think of it along the line of cooking knives. If you keep your knife sharp it will cut easier & smoother but when it is dull you end up pushing harder and increase the chance of cutting yourself.
Interesting point...but it could be that Mühle just got the best deal (maybe free) from Derby...just to push their product? Most likely not, but you never know. I agree totally though that it's a YMMV issue...And I'm quite the opposite regarding blades. So herewith a classic case of YMMV.
I use Merkur Slant and Mühle R41, but only with the cheapest blades (Dorco, Astra, Derby). If I focus on technique and prep, I get BBS all day long. My pet theory - these tools are so well designed and built that they'll always get great results under the right conditions. Derby Extra, one of the cheapest and least agreed-upon blade, ships as standard with R41.
Ask yourself this:
Would Mühle ship a poor performing blade to the typical R41 buyer - an experienced shaver who would discern in a heartbeat a subpar product?