Whether it stays or goes, both leagues should have the same rules.How 'bout another round of this debate?
I'm anti-DH, for the many reasons listed above.
Whether it stays or goes, both leagues should have the same rules.How 'bout another round of this debate?
I'm anti-DH, for the many reasons listed above.
Horrible idea that's screwed up the game (particularly with interleague play). If it went away tomorrow, no one but a few whiny pitchers would miss it. Go National League. Go Reds!
Horrible idea that's screwed up the game (particularly with interleague play). If it went away tomorrow, no one but a few whiny pitchers would miss it. Go National League. Go Reds!
I can, too. I just wish they would pick one argument and go with it. Could you imagine if there were different rules for NFC and AFC in the NFL?I can see it both ways. In the NL the managers have to make a lot of strategic decisions not involved in the AL. On the flip side you get more offense in the AL.....hypothetically unless you are a Rangers fan.
Yes. It's a player who hits and doesn't play defense so the pitcher doesn't have to hit. Only half of the teams use one.28 posts in and still no explanation. Let me guess...
DH = "designated hitter"?
Seem like cheating to me, if I understand it correctly.