File this under "Like I Need Another Obsession."
The recent talk on soap making had me looking into it to the point of reading public domain books on soap making. These were geared toward commercial and not amateur or small level batches. There's been a century on average of technological advances, though the basic chemistry is likely the same. But I still have questions. Lots and lots of questions.
For instance, hot process vs cold process. Hot process speeds saponification allowing for curing time measured in weeks vs months, and in some soaps the separation of glycerin from the batch and things like whipping to include air. But pouring can be lumpy and heat and constant attention is involved. At least, it would be on my fish cooker. I don't think my wife would want me to appropriate the crock pot. Cold process uses the heat of the reaction of the caustic with the water and fats to help drive saponification. No extra heat, besides melting the fats and oils together, is needed, and it pours smoother. But because there's no extra heat, curing can take months for the caustic to completely react with the fats and oils.
Since according to one source, the addition of "potash lye" prevents the separation of glycerine, does this mean there's no benefit, other than curing speed, of hot process over cold for shaving soaps? Looking at the nice, plastic, container than seems to have doubled as a mold for Van Der Hagan, does this mean cold process is used in industry?
One weird question: Since one type of soap can be used for a number of fragrances, is it possible to produce a large batch of soap, then, after it cures, mill it down and rebatch to add essential oils and other niceties?
The recent talk on soap making had me looking into it to the point of reading public domain books on soap making. These were geared toward commercial and not amateur or small level batches. There's been a century on average of technological advances, though the basic chemistry is likely the same. But I still have questions. Lots and lots of questions.
For instance, hot process vs cold process. Hot process speeds saponification allowing for curing time measured in weeks vs months, and in some soaps the separation of glycerin from the batch and things like whipping to include air. But pouring can be lumpy and heat and constant attention is involved. At least, it would be on my fish cooker. I don't think my wife would want me to appropriate the crock pot. Cold process uses the heat of the reaction of the caustic with the water and fats to help drive saponification. No extra heat, besides melting the fats and oils together, is needed, and it pours smoother. But because there's no extra heat, curing can take months for the caustic to completely react with the fats and oils.
Since according to one source, the addition of "potash lye" prevents the separation of glycerine, does this mean there's no benefit, other than curing speed, of hot process over cold for shaving soaps? Looking at the nice, plastic, container than seems to have doubled as a mold for Van Der Hagan, does this mean cold process is used in industry?
One weird question: Since one type of soap can be used for a number of fragrances, is it possible to produce a large batch of soap, then, after it cures, mill it down and rebatch to add essential oils and other niceties?