I have only used Gillette razors, a Super Speed, Slim Adjustable, and a Tech. Are the Merkur razors better? I like the looks of the 1906, and they appear to all have essentially the same head with different handles. Any thoughts?
I have only used Gillette razors, a Super Speed, Slim Adjustable, and a Tech. Are the Merkur razors better? I like the looks of the 1906, and they appear to all have essentially the same head with different handles. Any thoughts?
Phil
_________________________________________
Merkurs aren't necessarily better, but if you want to try one, the 1906 should be a good choice, though a lot of folks start with the 34C/HD as their introduction to Merkurs.
Mark
Are the 34C/HD a better choice than the 1906? I have been trying to replace an old Gillette Tech and they are just about as much as a new Merkur on eBay and at the antique stores I have been to, so I figured why nor just buy a new one?
Phil
_________________________________________
The 1904 is a beautiful razor and a great shaver. Weight-wise, it fits between the Classsic (33C) and the HD (34C), so for those that want to find a good middle ground as far as weight, this is it.
Is the 1904 closer to a Gillette Tech or a Gillette Pocket Edition?
Well, it is supposed to be a recreation of an early Gillette, so probably the Pocket Edition, though that would apply to the open comb version of the 1904. The safety bar version is probably more aggressive than a Tech.
Mark
The 1904 straight bar is just a standard Merkur head on the 1904 handle, plated in nickel, of course. This is more aggressive than the Tech.
Got one and like it allot.
Shave is similar to a HD if not the same.
It does have a "fun factor" as it has that "classic" look.
I'm very happy I got one.
David
Bookmarks