Is the feather travel razor more or less aggressive than a Tech?
Is the feather travel razor more or less aggressive than a Tech?
depends on the tech... however, I found it more aggressive.
If you want to base it on the blade gap, the feather portable has a 31 thousandths of an inch (.79 mm) gap and the tech has a 22 thousandths of an inch (.56 mm) gap.
~Justin
Yes, some have a curved bottom plate, some have a flat bottom plate.
Of course, there were different handles too...There is a thin handled model and a fat handled model. There are ones that are lighter because they are made of aluminum and not brass and have a different balance.
~Justin
I bought a Feather Portable just to get the longer handle to use with my Travel Tech.
I've used the Feather with a Derby and a Dorco ST-301, and got an OK shave. It is more aggressive than a Tech, some say too much so.
Since then I've acquired a nice travel kit with a folding mirror, a "Genuine English Cowhide" case, and an English Tech in it with brass top plate, aluminium base plate and handle. It has accompanied me on two trips so far.
I have a Feather portable on the way, so I'm interested in its properties as well. So to maybe put the question differently, how aggressive is the Feather, let's say on a scale of 1 to 5 (mild to aggressive) ? For me the comparison would be to a Merkur 38C. The best blade for me (so far) in the 38C is the Feather; I'm "assuming" that the Feather portable is designed to work well with Feather blades.
[COLOR="Gray"][B]"Before Badger & Blade, I was just scraping by."[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR="Orange"]38C/Feather Portable/'40s SS/Krona - Stainless/VDH Brush/Cremo/Palmolive Sensitive/C.O. Bigelow-Proraso/Nivea-Florena/Omega/Williams[/COLOR]
Bookmarks