I don't know why it has to come down to discussions about Brady/Gronkowski vs Belichick for Patriot success. Let's take a great coach with multiple Super Bowl wins. Chuck Knoll and the Steeler. Does anyone argue Knoll was the reason they won the SB and the players didn't have anything to do with it-Steel curtain, Ham, Lambert, Harris etc. Would they have won as many without Knoll. They would have won some for sure. Maybe as many. Maybe all. Would they have won as many without Bradshaw? I think they might have. Bradshaw was a good player on a great team. A good argument can be made that another QB would have won as many SB with that team. You can pick others Montana/Walsh or Staubach/Landry etc.
They have won three games without Brady/Gronkowski in 2016. They won 11 games when Brady was injured and Cassel took over. They didn't make the playoffs that year. This is what they have won without Brady/Gronkowski. The trophy case is bare. Clearly Belichick as a head coach hasn't won anything without Brady. He hasn't won anything without Gronkowski when he joined the team. The Patriots lost to the Giants in the SB when he was a shell off himself, hobbled with an ankle injury.
Patriots played the Bronco's in the 2013 AFC Championship game. Gronkowski was injured and didn't play. Would the Patriots have won if Gronkowski had played? Who knows! I certainly would have liked our chances better with Gronkowski.
Scar is a good coach. He has done well with talent and when he has had olive loaf for talent he didn't serve Beef Wellington. The Patriots have had some bad teams over 30 years while he was there. Including the year they finished last and drafted Bledsoe as first pick in the draft.
This year they have talent and Scar is working to have a consistent group playing together. Last year for whatever reason under the previous coach they had a rotation. Part of it was design and part was due to injury. It didn't work. Scar was with the Patriots last year as a consultant. This year he is on the coaching staff.
Brady and Gronkowski are HOF players. Belichick is a HOF coach. They have been very successful. The combination of the three works well.
Belichick isn't faultless. His strategy down the end of last season has been universally criticized in New England. Fans weren't worshipping at the hoodies feet. He had a number of horrible game plans down the stretch (Eagles, Dolphins). If the AFC Championship game had been played in Gillette the outcome may have been different. The Patriots with Brady are 2-7 versus the Bronco's in Denver. The Bronco's with Brady at Gillette are 5-2. Would you have liked your chances playing in Gillette?
I don't see any difference than the Bronco fans "hero worship" of Elway either as player or GM. We hold Brady and Gronkowski in the same rarefied air as their coach. To each...his own.
If you are trying to say Patriot players aren't so great...they just respond to great coaching. That's a little foolish.
You expound that Kubiak is a great coach. Coaches up his QB to get the most out of them etc. What's the difference?
They have won three games without Brady/Gronkowski in 2016. They won 11 games when Brady was injured and Cassel took over. They didn't make the playoffs that year. This is what they have won without Brady/Gronkowski. The trophy case is bare. Clearly Belichick as a head coach hasn't won anything without Brady. He hasn't won anything without Gronkowski when he joined the team. The Patriots lost to the Giants in the SB when he was a shell off himself, hobbled with an ankle injury.
Patriots played the Bronco's in the 2013 AFC Championship game. Gronkowski was injured and didn't play. Would the Patriots have won if Gronkowski had played? Who knows! I certainly would have liked our chances better with Gronkowski.
Scar is a good coach. He has done well with talent and when he has had olive loaf for talent he didn't serve Beef Wellington. The Patriots have had some bad teams over 30 years while he was there. Including the year they finished last and drafted Bledsoe as first pick in the draft.
This year they have talent and Scar is working to have a consistent group playing together. Last year for whatever reason under the previous coach they had a rotation. Part of it was design and part was due to injury. It didn't work. Scar was with the Patriots last year as a consultant. This year he is on the coaching staff.
Brady and Gronkowski are HOF players. Belichick is a HOF coach. They have been very successful. The combination of the three works well.
Belichick isn't faultless. His strategy down the end of last season has been universally criticized in New England. Fans weren't worshipping at the hoodies feet. He had a number of horrible game plans down the stretch (Eagles, Dolphins). If the AFC Championship game had been played in Gillette the outcome may have been different. The Patriots with Brady are 2-7 versus the Bronco's in Denver. The Bronco's with Brady at Gillette are 5-2. Would you have liked your chances playing in Gillette?
I don't see any difference than the Bronco fans "hero worship" of Elway either as player or GM. We hold Brady and Gronkowski in the same rarefied air as their coach. To each...his own.
If you are trying to say Patriot players aren't so great...they just respond to great coaching. That's a little foolish.
You expound that Kubiak is a great coach. Coaches up his QB to get the most out of them etc. What's the difference?
Last edited: