What's new

Nkon D610 or D750

Guys, I am a hobbyist photographer that is finally ready to upgrade to full frame from my Nikon D3100. I had my mind set on the D750 but Nikon is running a great rebate on the D610 right now and it is $800 cheaper. I really like the thought of the tilting screen because I do shoot some video of my 5 year old daughter but if I go with the less expensive D610 am I going to regret it?

Thanks,
BJ
 
AFAIK, the 610 is a "fixed" 600 with a processor upgrade. that said, the 750 is a different beast.

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3730396

Camera FeatureNikon D750Nikon D610
Sensor Resolution24.3 Million24.3 Million
Sensor TypeCMOSCMOS
Sensor Size35.9×24.0mm35.9×24.0mm
Sensor Pixel Size5.9µ5.9µ
Dust Reduction / Sensor CleaningYesYes
Image Size6,016 x 4,0166,016 x 4,016
Image ProcessorEXPEED 4EXPEED 3
Viewfinder TypePentaprismPentaprism
Viewfinder Coverage100%100%
Built-in FlashYes, with flash commander modeYes, with flash commander mode
Storage Media2x SD2x SD
Continuous Shooting Speed6.5 FPS6 FPS
Max Shutter Speed1/4000 to 30 sec1/4000 to 30 sec
Flash Sync Speed1/2001/200
Shutter Durability150,000 cycles150,000 cycles
Exposure Metering Sensor91,000-pixel RGB sensor 3D Color Matrix Metering III2,016-pixel RGB sensor 3D Color Matrix Metering II
Base ISOISO 100ISO 100
Native ISO SensitivityISO 100-12,800ISO 100-6,400
Boosted ISO SensitivityISO 50, ISO 25,600-51,200ISO 50, ISO 12,800-25,600
Autofocus SystemMulti-CAM 3500FX IIMulti-CAM 4800FX
Number of AF Points51 AF points, 15 cross-type39 AF points, 9 cross-type
Detection Range-3 to +19 EV (ISO 100, 68°F/20°C)-1 to 19 EV (ISO 100, 68°F/20°C)
AF DetectionUp to f/8 (11 AF points)Up to f/8 (7 AF points)
Video CapabilityYesYes
Video OutputMOV, Compressed and UncompressedMOV, Compressed and Uncompressed
Video Maximum Record Time20 min in 60p, 30 min in 30p20 min in 24p, 30 min in 30p
Video Maximum Resolution1920×1080 (1080p) @ 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p1920×1080 (1080p) @ 30p, 25p, 24p
Enhanced Video FeaturesYesNo
Audio RecordingBuilt-in stereo microphone
External stereo microphone (optional)
Built-in microphone
External stereo microphone (optional)
LCD Size and Type3.2″ diagonal TFT-LCD Tilting3.2″ diagonal TFT-LCD
LCD Resolution1,229,000 dots921,000 dots
HDR SupportYesYes
One Click ZoomYesNo
Picture Controls87
White Balance Bracketing2-9 exposures in 1, 2, or 3EV increments2 or 3 exposures in 1, 2 or 3EV increments
Built-in GPSNoNo
Wi-Fi FunctionalityBuilt-inEye-Fi Compatible, WU-1B, UT-1
BatteryEN-EL15 Lithium-ion BatteryEN-EL15 Lithium-ion Battery
Battery Life1,230 shots (CIPA)900 shots (CIPA)
Battery ChargerMH-25a Quick ChargerMH-25 Quick Charger
Weather Sealed BodyYesYes
USB Version3.02.0
Weight (Body Only)26.5 oz. (750g)26.8 oz. (760g)
Dimensions140.5 x 113 x 78mm141 x 113 x 82mm
MSRP Price$2,299 (as introduced)$2,099 (as introduced)


big cliffs, Faster processor, 1/2 frame second faster shutter better video, more advanced focussing system, better metering system better battery life
 
Last edited:
Both are great cameras. I had a 610 for several months while my 800 was in the shop, and was impressed.
the 750 has newer focusing and more video features, but I don't think you'd regret if you went with the 610.
 
As Sarimento1 said, both excellent cameras. Neither will disappoint. The 750 has a better autofocusing system but that doesn't mean the 610 has an old or bad one, just not quiet as good. If you can afford the 750, go for it, otherwise, 610 and save some money for a good lens, which, lets be honest, will make more difference than the camera body.
 
If you can swing it, I would try to get the D750. What do you have in the way of lenses? It would be a shame to use a DX lens on either of these bodies.
 
Looking at the feature list posted above, I don't see any new feature that adds the cost of a great lens to the D750 in terms of real world shooting. Super high ISOs only make for bad photos and I don't ever use the higher end of the D600. As far as video features are concerned, unless you are shooting something that doesn't move, neither camera's auto-focus can keep up with any real movement by the subject, get a Go-Pro. The Nikon 600 series are the best bang for the buck going, IMHO.
 
Guys, thanks for the responses so far. As far as lens go I have the following :

Nikon 70-300 mm VR
Nikon 105mm Macro VR
18-105 DX
18-55 DX
40mm Macro DX

My plan is to purchase a 50mm prime to go with the new camera until I can raise enough funds to get a solid mid range zoom. I've got the 40mm for sale and it is basically new. I'll also probably be selling the D3100 and the other DX lenses as well.
 
Assuming your big zoom and macro lens are FX. If you are buying the Nikon FX with a kit lens, the 24-85 VR that is standard with the 600 series is an awesome lens. With a 50mm f1.8 which is relatively inexpensive, you will have a dream set and can shoot anything you want.
 
Yes, the 70-300 and 105 are indeed FX lenses. I'm currently leaning towards the d750 as the sensor and auto focus seem to be quite a bit better. I'm just curious if they are $800 better as the 610 has the rebate right now and can be had for $1500 versus $2300 for the 750.
 
Yes, the 70-300 and 105 are indeed FX lenses. I'm currently leaning towards the d750 as the sensor and auto focus seem to be quite a bit better. I'm just curious if they are $800 better as the 610 has the rebate right now and can be had for $1500 versus $2300 for the 750.

Sensors are identical (see chart above) and AF points aren't a big deal. I use the camera's selector setting to choose the AF point I want the camera to use anyway. And lastly, $800 will buy a sweet piece of glass, which will help your photos more than both bodies put together. IMHO
 
I'm sorry, I meant the image processor and the AF system itself not the amount of AF points. The struggle is real and you are correct $800 would go nice towards a new piece of glass or some razors.
 
Well, I just bought the d750 and the 24-120 lens. Couldn't wait anymore. Should be a good combination and with a 50mm prime my kit should be set for quite a while.
 
Well, I just bought the d750 and the 24-120 lens. Couldn't wait anymore. Should be a good combination and with a 50mm prime my kit should be set for quite a while.

Awesome! Good for you! You will enjoy it very much! Now get out there and take some pictures....
 
the biggest thing, IMHO is the exspeed4 processor. the AF is a bit more sensitive, granted but the processor really reduces noise. the only thing i do not know is the buffer sizes. I LOVED my 7100 but the buffer sucked far too small
 
Camera arrived today. This thing is a huge jump up from my D3100 so I've got some learning to do but even with basic settings it takes some Sharp images. I'll play with it some tomorrow morning to see what I can do. Thanks for the help gents.
 
I bought the d750 yesterday and I love it. I only have the 50mm1.8d but the pictures are amazing. I've shot up to ISO 6400 with barely any noise it's a beast of a camera!!
 
If you can swing it, I would try to get the D750. What do you have in the way of lenses? It would be a shame to use a DX lens on either of these bodies.

the 610 has a DX mode i am sure the 750 does as well. in addition, a DX 35mm lens shows minimal and the kit 18-55 only when at the extreme ends of zoom show any vignetting.
 
the 610 has a DX mode i am sure the 750 does as well. in addition, a DX 35mm lens shows minimal and the kit 18-55 only when at the extreme ends of zoom show any vignetting.
I believe all of the Nikon FX camera's can shoot in DX. The issue is the use only a portion of the sensor so you might as well be shooting DX. The point of FX is to take advantage of the larger sensor.
 
I believe all of the Nikon FX camera's can shoot in DX. The issue is the use only a portion of the sensor so you might as well be shooting DX. The point of FX is to take advantage of the larger sensor.

This is correct. I still sometimes use DX lens on my FX. There is no rule against it.
 
I believe all of the Nikon FX camera's can shoot in DX. The issue is the use only a portion of the sensor so you might as well be shooting DX. The point of FX is to take advantage of the larger sensor.

in principle, yes. but if you are on a budget, you buy what you can when you can. if you can buy a completed 1969 Corvette, great, but sometimes you have to buy the body then as time goes get the LS-1 and modern trans at a later date.

Getting FX glass is important yes, but getting it before the body, not as much
 
Top Bottom