I have a Michael Masuyama 1.1 stub nib that I really like. It's great for grading papers, signing things, lists, etc... But, when it comes to note-taking, the line it puts down is just a bit too thick.
My 60th birthday's coming up and friends are asking my wife about a "group present". A Lamy 2000 with a Pendleton nib seems like a great suggestion. The question is which nib to order. (Pendleton has already told me to order either the .9 or the 1.1 Lamy nib with the 2000. These nibs give plenty of tipping material to work with.)
I can see his broad butter-line stub italic lays down too much of a line for the note taking pen I am after.
Looking for opinions from those of you with direct Pendleton experience with his fine and medium nib variants. I like a dark, wet line. I use Sustainable Earth notebooks from Staples. My note-taking hand is a mixture of script and print writing. My current note-taking pen is a Parker 51 with a stock medium stub nib.
Whose got an opinion they'd like to share?
Thanks!
Bob
My 60th birthday's coming up and friends are asking my wife about a "group present". A Lamy 2000 with a Pendleton nib seems like a great suggestion. The question is which nib to order. (Pendleton has already told me to order either the .9 or the 1.1 Lamy nib with the 2000. These nibs give plenty of tipping material to work with.)
I can see his broad butter-line stub italic lays down too much of a line for the note taking pen I am after.
Looking for opinions from those of you with direct Pendleton experience with his fine and medium nib variants. I like a dark, wet line. I use Sustainable Earth notebooks from Staples. My note-taking hand is a mixture of script and print writing. My current note-taking pen is a Parker 51 with a stock medium stub nib.
Whose got an opinion they'd like to share?
Thanks!
Bob