Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. Question Performance Differences Between EJ DE89 and Merkur 34(c)?

    I just purchased the EJ DE89L recently... and really like it. But, was also was recommended the Merkur 34c as an option or alternate razor. Have sensitive skin especially around the chin, upper and lower lip area, which is one of the reasons I chose the EJ. My objective is to find a DE that will offer a close clean shave for sensitive skin.

    Would appreciate feedback from those who have used both razors regarding their performance differences.

    Thanks.

    Life is a close-shave at best...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    19,917
    Images
    1

    Default

    I would go w the EJ it is milder but it will also be better than the Merkur for your skin situation.
    Joris-FaTip Lovers+ BOTOC+ LOSER+ I Can't hardly wait for tomorrow to come so I can shave!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Land Of Confusion
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    The DE89 is a more mild smooth shaver than the 34C to me at least.
    Dave

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    2,155
    Images
    26

    Default

    I love the EJ89, one of the best DE razors IMO. While the Merkur is nice, everything about the EJ is just better.
    ~ Arley
    • Slant Evangelist • Menthol Addict • Mergress/Progress Lover • Restored Brush Enthusiast •

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Lost in the lather
    Posts
    13,327
    Images
    33

    Default

    This does not answer your question but....... If you have the opportunity to pick up an older Gillette super adjustable you may find that it will work out well for you. It is a very mild razor when dialed back but can come out munching when cranked up. The super adjustable on 9 (max) is milder than a Futur on 1 (lowest) and when the SA is down at 1 (lowest) it is the mildest razor you will ever use..... but it does have a wide range of mild to choose from. It has the same blade gap as a EJ89 when it is set around 4 or 5. You can dial it down to 1 for your sensitive areas and up for your heavy growth areas
    SSB - LEMS - BOTOC - AOM - KOVT - VSOP - RSVP - BYOB - HTH - ARKO & VEG CHOSEN - YMMV

    Mick - Shaving Soap Forum Steward

    If you enjoy the time you spend on B&B - become a contributor and support B&B

  6. #6

    Default

    I've owned both, and I prefer the Merkur HD. I prefer more efficient/aggressive razors. It took 3 passes with the EJ to get me where the HD will with 2 passes.
    The plating on the EJ is nicer and the EJ is a nicer looking razor than the EJ. For me it's all about performance though. People with really sensitive skin tend to like the EJ to the HD.
    - Lucas

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Currently working in Suzhou, China. Born in Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    3,257

    Default

    The 89 is finshed far better, but the balance on an HD is perfect- it just seems to move on it's own.
    There is no harm in having both, or get a 1904 and use the handle from that to go with the head of the Muhle.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scottish steve View Post
    The 89 is finshed far better, but the balance on an HD is perfect- it just seems to move on it's own.

    +1 I like the feel of the shorter handle on the hd. That being said I use my r89 much more because it's just hard not to pick it up. One beautiful razor. Specially when it's sitting next to r41
    -Phil

  9. #9

    Default

    No reason not to get both and compare!

    They are both great razors.
    http://wiki.badgerandblade.com/Air_Travel

  10. #10

    Default

    IMO shaving101 has said it well: http://www.shaving101.com/index.php/...ger-de89l.html

    EJ :: better finish, milder, stylish
    HD :: industrial finish, more efficient, better balance
    -= Boris =- The man thinks, the horse thinks, the badger thinks, the boar thinks. The fish doesn't think, the fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Up North,Wisconsin
    Posts
    741

    Default

    Both are excellant razors. I opt for the EJ but I can easily see how someone would prefer the HD. Guess it is just a subjective call on your part.

  12. Thread Starter

    Default Thank - All the Inputs Have Been Great... and Really Appreicated !!(nt)

    Quote Originally Posted by fullrun View Post
    I just purchased the EJ DE89L recently... and really like it. But, was also was recommended the Merkur 34c as an option or alternate razor. Have sensitive skin especially around the chin, upper and lower lip area, which is one of the reasons I chose the EJ. My objective is to find a DE that will offer a close clean shave for sensitive skin.

    Would appreciate feedback from those who have used both razors regarding their performance differences.

    Thanks.

    Thanks for the time, input and share of your experience. Much appreciated.
    Life is a close-shave at best...

  13. Thread Starter

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turtle View Post
    This does not answer your question but....... If you have the opportunity to pick up an older Gillette super adjustable you may find that it will work out well for you. It is a very mild razor when dialed back but can come out munching when cranked up. The super adjustable on 9 (max) is milder than a Futur on 1 (lowest) and when the SA is down at 1 (lowest) it is the mildest razor you will ever use..... but it does have a wide range of mild to choose from. It has the same blade gap as a EJ89 when it is set around 4 or 5. You can dial it down to 1 for your sensitive areas and up for your heavy growth areas
    Have the slim SA, the Tech and Super Speed. Had been using the SA at 2 until I shaved off the goatee and then found it suddenly to be clumsy feeling and/ or heavy handed when it came to working the chin, above and below the mouth. Moved back to the Super Speed and Tech... but then wanted to explore the possibility of getting a closer shave for the sensitive areas which the SS will do in 3 passes. Now seeing if I can achieve that with the EJ89 and the Feather AS (which I really like as I get the hang of its sweet spot.) But, it never dawned on me to switch settings for the different areas on the face... Thanks, Turtle...
    Life is a close-shave at best...

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Merkur 38C vs. Edwin Jagger DE89 (performance differences)
    By Matt555 in forum Double Edged Razors
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-12-2013, 01:41 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-26-2012, 08:56 AM
  3. T&H Carlton v/s Merkur 38c? Price & Performance?
    By pundilal33 in forum Double Edged Razors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2009, 02:29 AM
  4. Omega Boar Brushes: Differences in performance?
    By Basset in forum Shaving Brushes
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-19-2009, 06:55 AM
  5. Differences In Aristocrat Performance by Years?
    By Basset in forum Double Edged Razors
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-26-2008, 08:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •