I don't necessarily think that's true. Finding Richard Pryor funny because he points out different behaviors among whites/blacks doesn't make a person racist, any more than enjoying the Three Stooges makes one a buffoon.
EDIT: I would add that comedy is certainly dependent on context. Chris Rock talking about his experiences growing in black neighborhoods in NYC is funny; it's observational humor told from a position to have firsthand knowledge. If Larry the Cable Guy attempted the same material, it would be uncomfortable - to say the least. It's a matter of perspective.
Last edited by TonyH; 05-02-2012 at 10:36 AM.
No, I'm not suggesting that enjoying the Three Stooges makes one a buffoon. But someone who finds the Three Stooges funny is going to be a different person compared to someone who does not find them funny. I'm suggesting the much broader notion that the kinds of things we find funny are part of what makes us who we are. Someone who prefers classical music to heavy metal is going to be different from someone whose preferences are the other way around. Again, our tastes, preferences, thoughts, and actions tell our stories. I'm not evaluating those stories right now (ie, judging one story better than another). I'm merely proposing that even something as simple as our preferences in comedy does contribute to our character and identity.
» » Steve Mott (husband ∙ father ∙ Christian)
I can't make up my mind on The Three Stooges. I enjoyed them as a kid. Now I generally HATE movies where the characters act like retards. I can't stand Will Ferrel or Sasha Cohen. The Green Hornet was ruined for me because Seth Rogen looked and acted somewhat like Will.
I guess it will be a WTC (Wait Till Cable) movie.
Part of the humor and allure of the Stooges during their heyday was the fact that they generally performed in short films.
I don't think I could take an hour and a half of the real 3 Stooges in one sitting, let alone an hour and a half of 3 guys doing a poor impression of the stooges set in modern times.
PhilΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I agree with some of you regarding the Stooges. The anger and persistent abuse between the guys never appealed to me, not even when made to seem light and comical. I am a big fan both of Laurel & Hardy as well as Abbott & Costello. These guys had their differences and were often frustrated with one another, but the comedy didn't play out in repetitive violence. Another factor is sophistication of the comedy: I prefer the subtle pauses and the impeccable timing of the great classic comedians and teams. They knew when to act and when doing nothing at all would impact their audiences. Brash shotgun approaches to comedy never tickle my funny bone.
» » Steve Mott (husband ∙ father ∙ Christian)
Jim Gaffigan
Ben - Chicago sports fan, just had TWINS 12/19!
Favs: Eclipse, Joris, FaTip, Senator, R41--Rare Finds: Eclipse, Double Ring, Toggle, Sticky, Ziglar, Barbasol
Perhaps the funniest writer and producer of all time is Mel Brooks. A true genius, I saw an interview with him a couple of months ago and he was hilarious.
I didn't surrender, they made my horse surrender though.
Walter Havens, proud member of the Brotherhood of the Open Comb
Bringer of the Badger. "it's my job"
Mike Nichols and Elaine May
Bob and Ray
The Smothers Brothers
I agree completely. His portrayal was great, the person he was portraying was lame. I never once watched AK and laughed. Acting anti-social is comical? There is a video of him on Letterman back in the 80's where he is completely awkward and the audience is roaring. I just don't get it.
Sinner Saved By Grace
"we love the truth when it enlightens us, but hate it when it convicts us"
-Augustine
A severed foot will always make the ultimate stocking stuffer R.I.P. Mitch !
James - "I got into trouble once, and have remained there ever since."
It's not my fault, it's James' blame him
mark
The Definition of a Gentleman: Someone who is never rude, except on purpose.
Bookmarks