So how does the fearsome Feather do it?
First one has to quantify how to judge a blades sharpness. This can easily be accomplished by asking what features equal a dull blade.
A dull blade can easily be defined as dull if it does any of the following: "pulls as it cuts, takes effort to cut, does not glide smoothly, or causes skin irritation".
Therefore a blade that does any of the above can not be called sharp.
When reading reviews on the Feather, the general consensus is that besides being scary sharp, it causes weepers out of nowhere, is sort of rough cutting, and is good for two and at most three shaves.
The Derby would be described as not very sharp. Takes some effort to cut but is very forgiving as it is dull and will therefore not cut your face.
The Astra would be described as nice and smooth but not as sharp as the golden standard that is The Feather.
With the above holding true, why would someone who is shown the above line up of blades generally say that the feather is the sharpest? After all it both causes nasty nicks and at times feels rough.
1. Public perception is on its side. It is almost a given that people will say that a Feather is Scary Sharp! Monkey see monkey do.
2. The belief that a fresh blade that is able to cut your face must be sharp. It has to be sharp because it was able to cut me right? Nope, it just makes the blade Scary as opposed to Sharp.
3. The very short usability of the blade (2 or 3 shaves) somehow makes it seem so much sharper. Since the blade is scary sharp, it can only maintain that edge for 2 or 3 shaves. This line of reasoning is totally wrong. It is only "good" for 2 or 3 shaves because it starts off dull then quickly degrades into super face scaring dull.
The Feather is the most expensive, highly regarded, and yet utterly worthless DE blade on the market today.
This is my conclusion after both using and reading (dam you B&B forums!) about these three blades.
I look forward to seeing if anyone can find any reason to believe that a Feather is Sharp as opposed to just plain face scaring Scary.
First one has to quantify how to judge a blades sharpness. This can easily be accomplished by asking what features equal a dull blade.
A dull blade can easily be defined as dull if it does any of the following: "pulls as it cuts, takes effort to cut, does not glide smoothly, or causes skin irritation".
Therefore a blade that does any of the above can not be called sharp.
When reading reviews on the Feather, the general consensus is that besides being scary sharp, it causes weepers out of nowhere, is sort of rough cutting, and is good for two and at most three shaves.
The Derby would be described as not very sharp. Takes some effort to cut but is very forgiving as it is dull and will therefore not cut your face.
The Astra would be described as nice and smooth but not as sharp as the golden standard that is The Feather.
With the above holding true, why would someone who is shown the above line up of blades generally say that the feather is the sharpest? After all it both causes nasty nicks and at times feels rough.
1. Public perception is on its side. It is almost a given that people will say that a Feather is Scary Sharp! Monkey see monkey do.
2. The belief that a fresh blade that is able to cut your face must be sharp. It has to be sharp because it was able to cut me right? Nope, it just makes the blade Scary as opposed to Sharp.
3. The very short usability of the blade (2 or 3 shaves) somehow makes it seem so much sharper. Since the blade is scary sharp, it can only maintain that edge for 2 or 3 shaves. This line of reasoning is totally wrong. It is only "good" for 2 or 3 shaves because it starts off dull then quickly degrades into super face scaring dull.
The Feather is the most expensive, highly regarded, and yet utterly worthless DE blade on the market today.
This is my conclusion after both using and reading (dam you B&B forums!) about these three blades.
I look forward to seeing if anyone can find any reason to believe that a Feather is Sharp as opposed to just plain face scaring Scary.