Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: Casey Anthony thread: for those who didn't get to participate in the original thread

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Posts
    3,102

    Default Casey Anthony thread: for those who didn't get to participate in the original thread

    I had spent considerable time writing a thoughtful post about this, then hit Reply, then bloop! Thread Closed. This is my first major criticism of this forum. Delete the offending posts, not the thread.

    I was going to say that I thought the Headline News Network (HLN) coverage was the worst part of it because it was like a pep rally, with overt bias toward opinions they thought were popular. It was an unprofessional free for all, with the one interrupting and yelling the loudest getting his/her say in.

    At what point did the media quit reporting and started telling us what to think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    10,183

    Default

    Right about the time that Cronkite, Brinkley and Huntley retired. They were journalists not entertainers. It's not about the news these days. Like everything else it's about entertainment and sensationalism and profit. I am afraid that a "real" news program would not fair well in the ratings in today's America. What a shame it is.
    Dave

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NJ & The Fortress of Solitude
    Posts
    41,574
    Images
    78

    Default

    You're spot on regarding HLN. In Session's coverage was better, but still nowhere near what the public deserves from a network given the opportunity to cover such a high profile and important case.
    Director of the B&B Stjynnkii Membörd Dummpsjterd.

    Baby Brain Smooth.

    B&B Old Fogies Club and the original Old Fogie

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Utility Muffin Research Laboratory
    Posts
    18,144
    Images
    1

    Default

    Bias in the media? Who'd have thunk it? I've pretty much given up on the television as a source for news.
    Last edited by professorchaos; 07-07-2011 at 11:42 AM.
    Henry

    My Kit

    henry (@) badgerandblade.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    4,303
    Images
    24

    Default

    I don't get news from TV anymore, but the working principle seems to have evolved from "report the truth" to "report exactly two sides of every story" to... it's hard to describe without using naughty words.

    For a more jaw-dropping story involving the relationship between journalistic practices (to use the term journalism is an insult to real journalists) and the law, see the phone hacking scandal developing in England. Now that is something to make your hair curl.
    Cheers,
    Francesco

    3017: A Soap Odyssey

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,512
    Images
    7

    Default

    I stopped watching TV a few years ago. The only information I have had from this trial is blurbs I saw while checking out Google News. Otherwise, I'm ignorant. I do not feel deprived, though. I have seen Nancy Grace on the screen, briefly, while walking by my son's room.

    Good riddance.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    7,751
    Images
    1

    Arrow

    You pretty much restated what I said in the closed thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by California Cajun View Post
    I had spent considerable time writing a thoughtful post about this, then hit Reply, then bloop! Thread Closed. This is my first major criticism of this forum. Delete the offending posts, not the thread.

    I was going to say that I thought the Headline News Network (HLN) coverage was the worst part of it because it was like a pep rally, with overt bias toward opinions they thought were popular. It was an unprofessional free for all, with the one interrupting and yelling the loudest getting his/her say in.

    At what point did the media quit reporting and started telling us what to think?
    ~Jon~
    BBS Challenged

    Member of the B&B 2011 Rudy Vey custom Brush Buy
    I gave to Soap For Hope
    I survived the 2011 B&B Upgrade

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Badger State AGAIN
    Posts
    15,353
    Images
    1

    Default

    The old news is the new news. Watch Ace in the Hole with Kirk Douglas. It's all just a circus. Freedom of the press has turned into freedom to manipulate the truth and steer public opinion.
    Relax...Take it easy...Enjoy the lather. Dennis

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    hockey town
    Posts
    2,343
    Images
    13

    Default

    i stayed away till tonight... all i can say is,, its hard to prove murder with no solid evidence. noone really even knows HOW she died. hard to prove anything at that point.

  10. #10

    Default

    Good to see you start a new thread. Care to share the post you originally prepared?

    Thanks,
    Mike

    Quote Originally Posted by California Cajun View Post
    I had spent considerable time writing a thoughtful post about this, then hit Reply, then bloop! Thread Closed. This is my first major criticism of this forum. Delete the offending posts, not the thread.

    I was going to say that I thought the Headline News Network (HLN) coverage was the worst part of it because it was like a pep rally, with overt bias toward opinions they thought were popular. It was an unprofessional free for all, with the one interrupting and yelling the loudest getting his/her say in.

    At what point did the media quit reporting and started telling us what to think?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Posts
    3,102
    Thread Starter

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikey View Post
    Good to see you start a new thread. Care to share the post you originally prepared?

    Thanks,
    Mike
    What you quoted is pretty much what I had intended to say. The worst part of the trial was the opinionated and unprofessional coverage by HLN. Juries are going to surprise people from time to time, that's part of the process. I had wondered how the case looked to a juror that didn't watch the coverage on HLN, which is what I wanted them to provide. As someone who works when most of the trial took place, I wanted a synopsis of what happened, not a campaign to convict the defendant.

    In addition to having the biases of the hosts forced upon me, I didn't like the other funny business that was going on during the programming. In the lower right-hand corner of the TV screen, they kept alternating JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE with her picture, and on the lower left-hand side highlighting BREAKING NEWS along with another message. The HLN logo is like a quotation and the point on the lower left-hand side of it kept revolving around the rest of the logo. They also kept showing footage of Caylee playing with Mom and swimming with Grandma over and over again. Nancy Grace kept referring to Casey Anthony as "Tot Mom" in a condescending manner. The talking and the visual antics added up to one big distraction. It was like the network was trying to manipulate me toward a conclusion for fear I might not be able to think for myself.

    I think the network got what it wanted. They tried to raise the emotions of the viewer to a fever pitch during the trial, and when it was over, held the viewers a few more days to re-hash what went wrong when things didn't wind up the way they expected.

  12. #12

    Default

    It's very sad to me folks in this country care more about a trial then they do about the situation this country is in right now.

  13. #13

    Default

    I never really understood why this trial was much of a news story. Tragic murders take place in this country all too frequently. Was it because the accused was somewhat attractive and, dare I say, Caucasian? Or because the prosecution took the giant step of seeking the death penalty without more conclusive evidence? As for the verdict, none of us was in the courtroom to see the admissible evidence through the eyes of the jury, without the "help" of big corporations that were making big bucks off of the trial.
    __________________________________
    I love the smell of Proraso in the morning!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    6,149

    Default

    I first saw this and asked myself why if one was closed do we open the can of worms again? Then, I see the OP's "complaint" about not deleting the offending posts only and I must agree that'd be a good solution.

    I haven't ready this thread, nor the other so not sure why it was closed. Don't particularly care either.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    2,647

    Default

    I tend to agree with the last few posts. I'm not sure why this particular case made the news. I am even more confused by Nancy Grace, who seems to make a great deal of money by means of exploiting tragedy. She has also been wrong about many of the things she has criticized (Duke lacrosse scandal, Jennifer Wilbanks' disappearance, etc.) She is a loudmouthed person whose existence on television confounds me.
    Shane - Member since 6-10-06

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    918

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greyfox View Post
    Right about the time that Cronkite, Brinkley and Huntley retired. They were journalists not entertainers. It's not about the news these days. Like everything else it's about entertainment and sensationalism and profit. I am afraid that a "real" news program would not fair well in the ratings in today's America. What a shame it is.
    The only one I liked from the next generation was the Late Peter Jennings.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Badger State AGAIN
    Posts
    15,353
    Images
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shane View Post
    I tend to agree with the last few posts. I'm not sure why this particular case made the news. I am even more confused by Nancy Grace, who seems to make a great deal of money by means of exploiting tragedy. She has also been wrong about many of the things she has criticized (Duke lacrosse scandal, Jennifer Wilbanks' disappearance, etc.) She is a loudmouthed person whose existence on television confounds me.
    I thought only meteorologists got paid to be wrong that many times. Apparently it's OK in the world of sensationalism. I find this type of programming most despicable. It is the modern day lynch mob. The only thing worse are the people who gobble this stuff up.

    It is frightening to hear people say stuff like, "She doesn't even deserve a trial!" These are the type of comments I hear from fans of sensationalist programming. OF COURSE SHE DESERVES A TRIAL!!! What the heck are they thinking? This was one of the founding principles of the United States. She also deserves the consequences of the trial if found guilty. The trial of public opinion is a very scary thing, as it all depends on who is telling and twisting the story.

    The whole purpose of having a trial is to remove some of the irrational emotions from the verdict and focus on the facts. Even Charles Manson deserved a trial and was rightfully found guilty.
    Relax...Take it easy...Enjoy the lather. Dennis

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NJ & The Fortress of Solitude
    Posts
    41,574
    Images
    78

    Default

    I still think the schmuck who flipped the finger to the prosecutor received a proportionately harsher sentence than Casey did.
    Director of the B&B Stjynnkii Membörd Dummpsjterd.

    Baby Brain Smooth.

    B&B Old Fogies Club and the original Old Fogie

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    7,395
    Images
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thebigspendur View Post
    It's very sad to me folks in this country care more about a trial then they do about the situation this country is in right now.
    With all deference, I wouldn't assume that the OP and other posters care more about the trial than our current economic situation (I'm guessing that might be what you are referring to), but I can see that the co-opting of the press by entertainment media and business is one of the most pressing problems we as citizens face. I'm OK with the OP's post as he brings up an important point.

    Take care.
    ~Dex

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Posts
    3,102
    Thread Starter

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stubblefield View Post
    With all deference, I wouldn't assume that the OP and other posters care more about the trial than our current economic situation (I'm guessing that might be what you are referring to), but I can see that the co-opting of the press by entertainment media and business is one of the most pressing problems we as citizens face. I'm OK with the OP's post as he brings up an important point.

    Take care.
    Thank you for your post. My interest in this topic was the level media attention it received and the type of media attention it received. It also crossed my mind that it is more difficult to conduct a fair trial when you have talking heads fanning the flames and riling people up.

    I think this case was selected for airplay for ratings purposes. No doubt there are similar cases that don't receive anywhere near this kind of attention.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-09-2013, 06:55 AM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-02-2012, 11:23 AM
  3. Shouldn't have closed the Casey Anthony thread
    By California Cajun in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-07-2011, 11:54 AM
  4. Casey Anthony not guilty
    By ouch in forum The Barber Shop
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 07-06-2011, 07:31 PM
  5. Discussion thread for Anthony In Grown Hiar Treatment
    By gse123 in forum Skin, Body & Hair Care
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-14-2007, 11:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
By accessing Badger & Blade, you agree to abide by the Terms of Usage. You can find our Privacy Policy here.
Once submitted, any posts, images, or content become the property of Badger & Blade.
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.