Is this razor possible ?

[Hex]

I collect Techs and saw this somewhere else.
====================================

Fat Handle Tech...No Date Code (stamped 1932), very good condition (mintish), triangular slots,

================================

From my reading, this might be the 1951 Canadian with a 1932 patent number date. However, according to Achim, the 1951 did not have the triangular slots.

http://www.mr-razor.com/ebay/1938-19...on%20klein.jpg

Any ideas ?

[mr-razor]

The 1938-1945 Canadian fat handle Tech has this triangular slots

[Hex]

The 1938-1945 Canadian fat handle Tech has this triangular slots

Thank you Mr-Razor.

But does 1938-1945 Canadian fat handle Tech have 1932 stamped in the metal ?

[M80]

looks like what you are talking about.

[nemo]

Great shavers, those Canadian Techs. Something a little better about them for a closer shave than the USA ones for me.

[mr-razor]

Thank you Mr-Razor.

But does 1938-1945 Canadian fat handle Tech have 1932 stamped in the metal ?

1932 is the patent year. You see on my Tech-Link, that the 1951 Canadian Tech has the 1932 stamp too. Before 1951 there is no date code on the base plate.

[bakerbarber]

Techs shave great with weight added to the handles..!!

[bakerbarber]

Great shavers, those Canadian Techs. Something a little better about them for a closer shave than the USA ones for me.

It's the metric system....

[Hex]

looks like what you are talking about.

That's the one M80, thanks. And since it has the triangular slots, it's from 1938-1945......Right ??

And thanks for all who straightened me out, or at least tried to.

[Den]

I have the same Tech so it's nice to finally get a more accurate production year.

[ShavinBacon]

I think I am the only soul in the world who gets a terrible shave from a tech. Granted, I have only used one but it tears me up which is weird because everyone always talks about how mild it is. When I use a DE adjustable it is set to 7 or 9 and I use SE's, especially the OCMM. I love the OCMM. I have no idea why the tech gives me so much trouble.

[GeorgeMason]

I have the same razor, but I can't give an opinion on whether or not the Canadian model is more aggressive or not because its the only Tech I have. I will say that it is more aggressive then my mid 50s Rocket Flare Tip with the II on the base plate.

Now if someone wants to send me a new non Canadian Tech I would gladly give it a try shaving one side of my face with one and the the other side with the other to give an opinion

[dfwde]

If anyone is in a giving mood I'll take one too!