Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    297

    Default Why is the Muhle R89 More Expensive than the EJ DE89L?

    I have been a Merkur HD user for a long time. After reading reviews I just ordered a Muhle R89 which I am very excited to try. Upon further reading I see that many love(and maybe prefer) the Edwin Jagger DE89L. So why is the Muhle so much more money? Almost twice the price it seems. Did I make a mistake? Should I have ordered the EJ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Posts
    3,842
    Images
    2

    Default

    IMHO, not.
    I love the Muhle designs and indeed, the heads are the same.

    I did read however that on the Muhle site a R89 is $61 now.
    A bit of B&Bgoogling will reveal better prices (I have seen $26,98, as far as I remember).

    .
    Wim

    Have a nice day!

  3. #3

    Default

    I haven't tried the EJ, but for my face the R89 is so far superior to the Merkur HD that I'm just not using the HD at all. For fun, I still alternate with my Tech, Superspeed and Slim and occasionally a Feather Travel, but the R89 is my current champ.

    BTW, the best combo I've found is the R89 with Wilkinson Sword blade (German , not Indian) and Kell's Original stick soap.
    CHAUCER

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    suburb of Buffalo
    Posts
    173

    Default

    the handle on the muhle is suppose to be better. I have the muhle, its a nice handle, but I dont know if its worth all the extra money. The way I look at it is, it is going to be around for a long time, so I got the better of the two. You may be paying just for the name, too. So if Muhle makes both heads, which are very well made, and they put there name on the one, so its worth 20 bucks more, but there may be more work involved in making the muhle handle. Here is another point, the edwin Jaggers with real nice handles with the same head are about $130 dollars. They are real nice handles, but I would never pay that much extra. How about you?
    Last edited by papi; 08-15-2010 at 10:47 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Kingston, NY
    Posts
    660
    Images
    13

    Default

    What about the Muhle handle is supposed to be better? I have both and am somewhat split as to which I prefer. I think I prefer the extra weight of the EJ handle, and the look and feel of the Muhle's knurled handle.
    The weight difference is slight but noticeable, and probably changes the razor's balance point. Someone posted the opinion that the Muhle's lighter handle makes for a less aggressive shave. I was mostly enticed to get it by the textured grip.

    As for price, I'd keep an eye on the BST forum if you want to get a Muhle without paying so much. I forget how much I paid, but it was certainly comparable to EJ pricing.
    Last edited by roboboticus; 08-15-2010 at 11:36 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    19,408
    Images
    1

    Default

    i love my ej..best razor yet
    Joris-FaTip Lovers+ BOTOC+ LOSER+ I Can't hardly wait for tomorrow to come so I can shave!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Kingston, NY
    Posts
    660
    Images
    13

    Default

    There's a Muhle on BST right now

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    727

    Default

    I haven't shaved with the R89, but I've compared it side by side with the DE89L. After feeling the DE89L, the R89 felt like the handle must be just a very thin tube. It felt so much lighter and insubstantial.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Alameda CA
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    put the head on a RazorWorks handle.
    Bob can make you anything you want.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Greenwich, England
    Posts
    998

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CoolBurn View Post
    I have been a Merkur HD user for a long time. After reading reviews I just ordered a Muhle R89 which I am very excited to try. Upon further reading I see that many love(and maybe prefer) the Edwin Jagger DE89L. So why is the Muhle so much more money? Almost twice the price it seems. Did I make a mistake? Should I have ordered the EJ?
    They are both about the same price in the UK. I chose the Muehle because I preferred to have the chrome plated handle.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roboboticus View Post
    What about the Muhle handle is supposed to be better? I have both and am somewhat split as to which I prefer. I think I prefer the extra weight of the EJ handle, and the look and feel of the Muhle's knurled handle.
    The weight difference is slight but noticeable, and probably changes the razor's balance point. Someone posted the opinion that the Muhle's lighter handle makes for a less aggressive shave. I was mostly enticed to get it by the textured grip.

    As for price, I'd keep an eye on the BST forum if you want to get a Muhle without paying so much. I forget how much I paid, but it was certainly comparable to EJ pricing.
    My experience is the same. I use ej a d muhle is collecting dust since I prefer the extra weight. I cannot say that I prefer it over hd, since I get the same shave from both.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    479

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roboboticus View Post
    the extra weight of the EJ handle, and the look and feel of the Muhle's knurled handle.
    I was set to buy the Muhle as I like the handle aesthetically more than the EJ lined but on learning that the EJ had extra heft, went with it instead.

    The EJ is a fine razor, well finished and delivers a solid shave.
    - Kevin

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Michigan's Thumb
    Posts
    9,659
    Images
    4

    Default

    I have a Muhle R89, and it gives wonderful shaves. Easily in the top two of best razors on the market today.
    ~~JOHN~~*Founding member of ALPHA Team*

  14. #14

    Default

    At www.thesuperiorshave.com the Muehle is $45 shipped within the continental US (and I think only $2 more to Canada). It's still more than the cheapest EJ price, but I thought the knurling on the handle would be worth it so I got one. I don't regret my decision one bit.

  15. #15

    Default

    There is an even bigger discrepancy in the EJ/Muhle creams, soaps, and aftershaves.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwsher View Post
    I was set to buy the Muhle as I like the handle aesthetically more than the EJ lined but on learning that the EJ had extra heft, went with it instead.

    The EJ is a fine razor, well finished and delivers a solid shave.
    I have two EJ's and am very happy with both.
    Razors: Merkur 38C, Edwin Jagger DE89L, Edwin Jagger DE86

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Free State of Jones (Google it, it's fun!)
    Posts
    1,531

    Default

    If you bought the Muhle case, you might as well go with the Muhle R89.

    Case:

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Burnsville, MN USA
    Posts
    65

    Default

    A reviewer on the page for the R89 at a purveyor's web site said that he owns both and swears that the heads look alike but (to him) the Muhle was clearly better. Even though the dude was probably a shill, I was influenced to buy the Muhle (which, btw, arrived today and will be up for a tryout in the morning). I'll throw my 2 cents in after I try it
    "for a price, I'll murder your mice"

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Greenwich, England
    Posts
    998

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by majikmaus View Post
    A reviewer on the page for the R89 at a purveyor's web site said that he owns both and swears that the heads look alike but (to him) the Muhle was clearly better. Even though the dude was probably a shill, I was influenced to buy the Muhle (which, btw, arrived today and will be up for a tryout in the morning). I'll throw my 2 cents in after I try it
    I believe (but please correct me if I am wrong) that Muehle does the chrome plating themselves. That might cause the two to appear different.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Burnsville, MN USA
    Posts
    65

    Default

    I much prefer the Muhle. BBS in 3 unhurried passes and the finish is very nice. that said, the R89 has a larger yet lighter handle and the knurling is deeper on the 33c giving it a better grip. I'll probably never use the Merkur again but may try swapping the handles if the posts and threading are the same
    "for a price, I'll murder your mice"

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Edwin Jagger DE89L and Muhle R89
    By jakespoppy in forum Shaving Mall - Buy/Sell/Trade
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-22-2011, 06:00 AM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-17-2011, 02:07 PM
  3. EJ DE89L vs. Muhle R89 handle
    By Silvermink in forum Double Edged Razors
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-28-2010, 04:08 PM
  4. Comparing the EJ DE89L to the Muhle R89
    By DESkydiver in forum Double Edged Razors
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2010, 01:16 PM
  5. EJ DE89L/Muhle R89 Handles
    By john parker in forum Double Edged Razors
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-15-2009, 06:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •