What's new

14 brushes compared - 5 badger, 5 boar, 4 synthetic

I look for two things in a brush before anything else: soft tips and sufficient backbone to provide something of a facial massage while lathering. Those are the bases for my ranking below, which runs in the order of increasing preference. Except as noted, all of the handles are nondescript, plastic and functional. None of them appears to be constructed more or less carefully than any other.

I am not comparing how well the brushes lather because I do not notice any significant differences among them. Each of these brushes can hold enough soap to create sufficient lather for many passes. However, the nature of the soap and lather affects how synthetic bristles feel. If synthetic bristles are not well lubricated by lather along their entire length, then they tend to stick to one another and bend together as a lump.

--

POOR

• Vulfix Super Badger Travel Brush (US$60 with metal tube). The tips sting painfully. The solid metal handle I find to be unpleasant, too heavy for the size of the brush and uncomfortably small. The bottom of the tube is not soldered on, it is affixed with two drops of glue--or was affixed until it popped off.

• Omega Sintex (US$15). The tips feel hard and the bristles feel stiff.

• Men-u Premier Synthetic (US$55). Better than the Omega Sintex above but similar failings.

FAIR

• Rooney 2/1 Finest Badger (US$210). Excellent at the start of a shave--soft tips with nice backbone--but after several passes the tips begin to sting. Also, I dislike the handle because, although it is easiest to wield a brush with the fingertips near the knot, this handle is shaped so that a recess naturally found by the fingertips is near the end.

• Koh-i-Noor SC67 Boar (US$22). Soft tips, comfortable to use and not problematic in any way, but too little backbone to make lathering enjoyable. This knot blooms larger on the face than any of the others on this list save the two big brushes in the category below. Koh-i-Noor supply the same knot in fancier, costlier handles, but these are shaped like the handle of the Rooney 2/1 above, so they look to be less comfortable.

• Rooney Synthetic Badger (US$45). The tips feel soft; the stiffness depends upon the lubricity of the lather, how much pressure I apply, and what shape the knot is taking. It ranges from a little on the stiff side to very nice. This brush has a little more backbone than the Jagger Synthetic below: some days I prefer one of these two, other days the other.

• Edwin Jagger New Synthetic (US$55 with plastic tube). The tips feel soft; the stiffness depends upon the lubricity of the lather, how much pressure I apply, and what shape the knot is taking. It ranges from a little on the stiff side to very nice. This brush has a little less backbone than the Rooney Synthetic below: some days I prefer one of these two, other days the other. I bought the small-handled travel brush in faux ivory and find it to be appropriate for travelling, but the handle feels short for its thickness. Jagger supply the same knot in another travel brush with a smaller handle, which is black, and in an assortment of models with larger handles. Jagger are owned by Mühle, who appear to offer the same knot in a different choice of handle, as well as similar knots that are smaller and larger.

GOOD — LARGE KNOT

• Rooney 1/2 Super Badger (US$100). Feels like a soft, dense, huge, luxurious mop. The knot blooms so large that I cannot move it far in any direction before running out of face.

• Omega Pro Boar 98 or 10098 (US$20). Densely packed soft tips with enough backbone to provide a gentle massage. The knot does not bloom so much as the Rooney's but it is still large for my face. It is also very long and combines with an unusually long handle to make me feel as though I am wielding a paintbrush. The "pro" appellation is appropriate here: this brush would be perfect for lathering up a customer in a chair. The Omega 49 has a similar knot with a shorter handle that would make the brush more pleasant to use.

GOOD — SMALL KNOT

• Rooney 1/1 Super Badger (US$75). Feels like a soft, dense, luxurious mop.

• Semogue 1305 or 1800 Boar (US$25). Densely packed soft tips with enough backbone to provide a gentle massage. Very similar to the Omega 10005 below except slightly less dense.

• Omega Boar 10005 (US$15). Densely packed soft tips with enough backbone to provide a gentle massage. Slightly denser than the Semogue 1305/1800 above. Feels like the Semogue 1470 below except slightly larger. Pleasant wooden handle.

• Semogue Boar 1470 (US$12). Densely packed soft tips with enough backbone to provide a gentle massage. Feels like the Omega 10005 above except slightly smaller, which makes it more controllable around the nose and lips. The Semogue's wooden handle is the most comfortable of any brush I have used. This strikes me as the most sensible brush for a newbie or for anybody on a budget. Indeed, this strikes me as the most sensible brush for anybody. There is little reason to spend any more. On the other hand, if you can afford a little luxury, the Wee Scot below may be that little reason.

• Simpson Wee Scot Best Badger ($40). This brush is so tiny that it looks like a toy but it is not. It has dense, soft tips with a narrow but moderately stiff backbone. These combine with its small size to give a more pleasurable massage than any of the other brushes. (A small knot moving a lot massages better than a large knot moving little.) In addition, its diminutive knot makes it easy to keep lather out of nostrils and off of lips, and it's so tiny that it dries almost as rapidly as a synthetic brush. The handle is also miniature but is sufficiently well proportioned that it feels fine to use.

--

From this comparison I conclude:

• Badger brushes range from nice to nasty.
• Some synthetic brushes are pleasant to use, more pleasant than some expensive badgers.
• Boar brushes tend to be nice.
• The price of a brush is unrelated to how it feels.

For travelling I would use either the Wee Scot or a synthetic but not a boar or a normally sized badger. A synthetic brush is less likely to mildew when put away damp in a suitcase that ends up misdirected onto a plane to Timbucktoo, and it is less likely to be put away damp in the first place since it dries faster--faster than badger and much faster than boar. The Wee Scot is an exception because of its size.

--

Note that unlike badger, synthetic and boar brushes will not become maximally soft and pliable as soon as you wet the bristles. Synthetic bristles need to be lubricated by lather along their full length and boar bristles take several minutes of wetting to soften. If you use a boar brush, just before you wet your beard or head into the shower, wet the brush.

The tips of new boar brushes are usually pointed and prickly but with use the ends flag or split, assuming that the brush-maker kept the natural ends of most of the bristles and did not cut corners by trimming the brush to shape. You can accelerate this flagging by soaking the brush and drying it with a hair dryer. You may want to do this a couple of times or a dozen times, depending upon the brush. Also, a boar brush may feel softer if you train the knot as you train your hair so that the tips tend to bend slightly in one direction. Then, when you touch the brush to your face, any unsplit tips will not jab you.

For whatever it's worth, all of these brushes shed a few hairs when they were new but one of them never stopped shedding, the Rooney 1/1 Super Badger. Vintage Blades replaced it without problem.
 
Last edited:
Nice little write up on a lot of good brushes.

I'm glad you like the Wee Scot, it really is the most under rated shaving brush out there in my mind. People just don't take that little guy seriously.
 
I, too, like the Wee Scott quite a bit but it's really beneath the threshold of daily usability, at least for me. It offers fine dexterity around the lips and nose but it's too tiny to store that much lather and I find I have to mix more soap for a third pass, and sometimes even a second. So I am wondering if Simpson makes a larger brush with the same exact hair and bloom symmetry as the Wee Scott with all its attributes???
 
Interesting read! And even more so because you seem to be unbiassed as far as the type of brush is concerned!!

I wouldn't mind if you went for another dozen or so brushes and reported back since you seem to want the same thing out of a brush as I do. :biggrin:
 
I, too, like the Wee Scott quite a bit but it's really beneath the threshold of daily usability, at least for me.... It's too tiny to store that much lather and I find I have to mix more soap for a third pass, and sometimes even a second.

Out of curiosity, I just tried to see how many times I could lather my face with one soaping of my Wee Scot. After 10 latherings I got tired of the game yet a lot of soap still remained in the brush. I am sure that I would have had different results using some of the rock-hard waters of the UK but with water of any normal degree of hardness, the Wee Scot ought to be able to hold enough soap for four passes. I do not understand what you mean by "mix more soap" but perhaps that accounts for the difference in our experience. I don't mix anything, I just wet the brush, shake most of the water from it, then rub the brush against the soap until it holds enough.
 

Antique Hoosier

“Aircooled”
Manage to find a Pre-Vulfix Somerset Era Simpson Chubby in Best Badger and you will not believe the experience. I believe from reading your thoughful and well written post, it would be your number one face feel performance brush.
 
I do not understand what you mean by "mix more soap" but perhaps that accounts for the difference in our experience. I don't mix anything, I just wet the brush, shake most of the water from it, then rub the brush against the soap until it holds enough.

I do not face lather, so what I meant was that I found that I had to reapply soap to the brush and mix up fresh lather in the lather bowl after two passes. There are so many variables here (type of soap or cream, the quantity used, the technique of applying it) and I am sure there are people who find the Wee good enough to use for a four pass shave, but in my experience the Wee is better employed as a great travel brush. What I am looking for is a larger brush (not much larger though as you will lose dexterity) with a 18-20mm knot that is otherwise identical to the Wee. Any ideas on which Simpsons fit the bill?
 
What about the Duke 1?
I do not face lather, so what I meant was that I found that I had to reapply soap to the brush and mix up fresh lather in the lather bowl after two passes. There are so many variables here (type of soap or cream, the quantity used, the technique of applying it) and I am sure there are people who find the Wee good enough to use for a four pass shave, but in my experience the Wee is better employed as a great travel brush. What I am looking for is a larger brush (not much larger though as you will lose dexterity) with a 18-20mm knot that is otherwise identical to the Wee. Any ideas on which Simpsons fit the bill?
 
For travelling I would use either the Wee Scot or a synthetic but not a boar or a normally sized badger. A synthetic brush is less likely to mildew when put away damp in a suitcase that ends up misdirected onto a plane to Timbucktoo, and it is less likely to be put away damp in the first place since it dries faster--faster than badger and much faster than boar. The Wee Scot is an exception because of its size.

I have changed my mind about the suitability of a Wee Scot for travelling. A synthetic brush still dries faster and if a synthetic brush is not quite dry, it will not be damaged by a hair dryer.
 
Thanks for a great review. You don't see very many that include different bristle types.

I'm not so sure the Wee Scot is "under the radar". As I was poking around trying to decide what to get for my first brushes, it was mentioned A LOT.
 
Thanks for the great review. I've been considering getting a boar brush for a bit now and this helps push me over the edge. :thumbup1:
 
Top Bottom