SearchCollapse this Category

StatisticsCollapse this Category

Users 36,955
Products 2,975
Reviews 19,671
Views 3,816,734

Posting CalendarCollapse this Category

« June 2013
SunMon TueWed ThuFri Sat
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Random Products -
[Shaving Soaps (Reviews)]


thumb_lijun.jpg
Fitjars Shaving Soa


thumb_P1010019.JPG
Mama Bear's Smokin


thumb_12390387320Ecotools.JPG
Old Post Road #4 Sh


gillette_de.jpg
Penhaligon's Blenhe


default.jpg
Prairie Creations O


DSC_0028.JPG
The Gentlemens Quar

· more ·
 



thumb_generic.jpg









  • Pin It

Poster Info

I only have small ones
Posts: 1,252
Registered: August 2008
Location: Canterbury

 

Culmak Shaving Soap in Bowl
Reviews Views Date of last review
3 2226 Wed January 11, 2012
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
100% of reviewers $4.00 7.0

 

Description:
Culmak Shaving Soap, cost in the Uk is about 5.09 (GBP) for a puck and bowl, a refill costing around 3.27 (GBP). Right so it's not the cheapest, but it's also not hideously expensive...... I found the lather was good, although if not enough water is added in the first place the lather can become dry very quickly. Overall the scent is a bit of a "Hmmm I thought I smelt something", in that you can smell it if you wedge the puck up your nose having just opened the packet, which for me is perfect as I don't have to think about what scent I'm wearing to avoid scent clashes. Overall a good shaver, not OTT expensive and gives a very rich lather easily.
Keywords: Culmak Shaving Soap in Bowl

<<
photo-3.JPG

 

Author
Unknownsoldier

I only have small ones

Registered: August 2008
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 1252
Review Date: Thu October 15, 2009 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 0 

 
Positive aspects of the product (pros):
Cons:
Price: 5
Quality: 6
Scent: 7
Lather: 5
Efficacy: 5
Moisturizing: 6

 
Culmak Shaving Soap, cost in the Uk is about 5.09 (GBP) for a puck and bowl, a refill costing around 3.27 (GBP). Right so it's not the cheapest, but it's also not hideously expensive...... I found the lather was good, although if not enough water is added in the first place the lather can become dry very quickly. Overall the scent is a bit of a "Hmmm I thought I smelt something", in that you can smell it if you wedge the puck up your nose having just opened the packet, which for me is perfect as I don't have to think about what scent I'm wearing to avoid scent clashes. Overall a good shaver, not OTT expensive and gives a very rich lather easily.

------------------------------
My Aunty Hilda was like a sea mine.... she was in the war and she gave sailors a few shocks!
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user  
Beau Lochs

Proraso Pirate

Registered: August 2010
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 73
Review Date: Mon August 15, 2011 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9 

 
Positive aspects of the product (pros): Price and prefomance
Cons: Fragrance is mild
Price: 9
Quality: 9
Scent: 6
Lather: 9
Efficacy: 9
Moisturizing: 9

 
A great soap, the scent is quite mild in use but still there. The lather lasts and is very slick, it certainly performs in a way that does not reflect its cheapness.



The bowl the soap comes in is a firm plastic and feels quite reminiscent of Bakelite.
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user  
Toddy

Personna Grata

Registered: January 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 698
Review Date: Wed January 11, 2012 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Price you paid?: $4.00 | Rating: 5 

 
Positive aspects of the product (pros): Price
Cons: Makes skin dry afterwards
Price: 6
Quality: 6
Scent: 4
Lather: 7
Efficacy: 7
Moisturizing: 4

 
Firstly this is a reformulation in recent years and does not work as well as the previous Culmak soap. The current fragrance is quite a bitter rosemary herbal scent whereas the previous version was a woody scent. Not a bad performer but not one of the best. The previous formulation came in the same shaped bowl but a white bottom with red lid (an earlier formulation than that was tallow based and had a green lid)
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user  


Powered by: Reviewpost vB4 Enhanced
Copyright 2012 All Enthusiast, Inc.